“…First, our study departs from conventional approaches to inclusion as within-workplace activities to adopt a boundarycrossing concept that captures inside-out and outside-in inclusion between a company and its community based on a community psychology perspective (Fujimoto, et al, 2014;Trickett, 1996). The extant diversity inclusion/workforce literature commonly defines inclusion as minority members' insider status (Pelled, Ledford & Mohrman, 1999;Shore et al, 2011); belongingness (Lirio et al, 2008); full contribution (Roberson, 2006), engagement (Avery et al, 2008); voice (Bell et al, 2011;Wasserman, Gallegos & Ferdman, 2008); and participation in the organizational decision-making process (Mor Barak, 2013); as well as the means to draw out minority members' unique perspectives (Chavez & Weisinger, 2008) and to integrate differences (Nishii, 2013) within a workplace. Although these studies on inclusion are critical for creating workplaces that value minority workers' contributions and participation alongside majority workers, research on the inclusion of disenfranchised communities-besides job networks and recruitment or representation efforts-has been somewhat neglected in this stream of research (cf., DiTomaso, Post & Parks-Yancy, 2007;Fernandez & Fernandez-Mateo, 2006).…”