Beyond ‘donor-recipient relations’? A historical-institutionalist perspective on recent efforts to modernise EU partnerships with third countries

Abstract

This paper presents a historical-institutionalist perspective on the EU’s current efforts to modernise its development policy and reform its various relationships with third countries. Applying concepts that endogenise institutional change, the analysis looks into the origin and basis of the policy and describes the various types of development partnership that the EU pursues with third countries. The paper subsequently analyses the 2007 Joint Africa-EU Strategy and the negotiations on EU-ACP post-2020, with a specific focus on how the development of these partnerships over time affects current EU efforts to seek to move beyond donor-recipient relations. It observes a gap between the reform-oriented discourse and the relative continuity in relationships over time, which serves to secure both the support of reform-oriented actors and those seeking to preserve the status quo. Repetition of this strategy over time combined with the need to launch new initiatives as well as changing circumstances affect this broad-based consensus and the legitimacy of the partnerships concerned.

Blackmailing and Identity Profiling? The Behaviour of Populist Radical Right Governments in EU Development Policy

“…Following the start of the Juncker Commission in 2014, EU policy debates started on how cooperation between the EU and the ACP states was to be governed following the scheduled expiration of the Cotonou Agreement (2000-2020)-a legally binding cooperation framework for EU-ACP relations that had evolved from the Rome Treaty's association policy and governed development funding and trade relations between the EU and the ACP group (Keijzer, 2020).…”

Who Called Team Europe? The European Union’s Development Policy Response During the First Wave of COVID-19

“…Two days after the European Council meeting, the European Parliament adopted a resolution that challenged the Council to justify the ODA cuts that had been introduced under the current global conditions (EP resolution of 23 July). After long and protracted negotiations, the Parliament and the Council agreed on the final 2021–2027 budget framework, referred to as the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework, which increased the aforementioned international cooperation budget to €79.5 billion (Keijzer, 2020 ).…”

Fit for creating partnerships of equals with the global south? Tensions in the EU’s development policy post-2020

“…For instance, the first revision of the Cotonou agreement introduced flexibility so that the "EU could unilaterally raise country allocations in case of exceptional circumstances" (Carbone, 2013, p. 126). Also, the EU decided to use EDF reserves to fund the Emergency trust fund for Africa (2015) and the European fund for sustainable development (2017) without formal consultation through ACP or joint ACP-EU structures (Keijzer, 2020).…”