2003
DOI: 10.1086/374658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Flux‐limited Diffusion: Parallel Algorithms for Multidimensional Radiation Hydrodynamics

Abstract: This paper presents a new code for performing multidimensional radiation hydrodynamic (RHD) simulations on parallel computers involving anisotropic radiation fields and nonequilibrium effects. The radiation evolution modules described here encapsulate the physics provided by the serial algorithm of Stone et. al (1992), but add new functionality both with regard to physics and numerics. In detailing our method, we have documented both the analytic and discrete forms of the radiation moment solution and the vari… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
135
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spike's amplitude varies according to the model used for radiation and to the effective numerical resolution. Thanks to the AMR scheme, the spike's amplitude is larger in the supercritical case, but not as large as those obtained with M1 or VTEF models (Hayes & Norman 2003;González et al 2007). However, this last test shows the ability of our time-splitting method to integrate the RHD equations.…”
Section: D Full Rhd Tests: Radiative Shocksmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spike's amplitude varies according to the model used for radiation and to the effective numerical resolution. Thanks to the AMR scheme, the spike's amplitude is larger in the supercritical case, but not as large as those obtained with M1 or VTEF models (Hayes & Norman 2003;González et al 2007). However, this last test shows the ability of our time-splitting method to integrate the RHD equations.…”
Section: D Full Rhd Tests: Radiative Shocksmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Mihalas & Mihalas 1984;Lowrie et al 2001;Mihalas & Auer 2001;Krumholz et al 2007b). Radiation hydrodynamics (RHD) methods have been developed in grid-based codes (Stone & Norman 1992;Hayes & Norman 2003;Krumholz et al 2007a;Kuiper et al 2010;Sekora & Stone 2010;Tomida et al 2010) and also in smoothed particles hydrodynamics (SPH) codes (Boss et al 2000;Whitehouse & Bate 2006;Stamatellos et al 2007). Most of these studies use the popular flux-limited diffusion approximation (FLD, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher order moment methods exist and can solve some of these problems (e.g. variable tensor Eddington factor methods, Hayes & Norman 2003, and the M1 closure method, González et al 2007), but none have yet proven cheap and robust enough for use in practical AMR star formation simulations. Frequency resolution.…”
Section: Types Of Moment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These describe conservation of mass (1), conservation of momentum (2), conservation of energy (3), chemical rate equations (4), flux-limited diffusion radiative transfer (5) and Poisson's equation (6), in a coordinate system that is comoving with the expanding universe [8,9,10,1]. The independent variables in these equations consist of the comoving baryonic density ρ b , the proper peculiar baryonic velocity v b , the total gas energy per unit mass e, the comoving number density for each chemical species n i , i = 1, .…”
Section: Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here κ T = κ + κ S is the total extinction coefficient, where κ is the opacity and κ S results from scattering [18]. The function (12) has been reformulated from its original version [9] to provide increased stability for scatteringfree simulations involving extremely small opacities (i.e. κ T = κ ≪ 1), as is typical in cosmology applications.…”
Section: Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%