Beyond “happy, angry, or sad?”: Age-of-poser and age-of-rater effects on multi-dimensional emotion perception

Riediger, Michaela; Voelkle, Manuel C.; Ebner, Natalie C.; Lindenberger, Ulman

doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.540812

Cited by 92 publications

(102 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…119,120 There are several reports in the general population that adults experience anger less frequently and intensely with increasing age, [121][122][123] express anger less destructively, [124][125][126] and are less prone to attribute anger to others. 127 The decrease in anger with age reported by service users and their home carers is consistent with these studies and extends the observation of decreasing anger with age to people with intellectual disabilities. However, although the age-related decline in anger was reported by the service users themselves and their home carers, it was not reported by their key workers.…”

Section: Agesupporting

confidence: 77%

A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities

Willner

Rose²,

Jahoda³

et al. 2013

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report should be referenced as follows:Willner P, Rose J, Jahoda A, Stenfert Kroese B, Felce D, MacMahon P, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive-behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities. Health Technol Assess 2013;17(21). This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/). Health Technology Assessment is indexed and abstracted inEditorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HTA archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Technology Assessment journalReports are published in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HTA programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. HTA programmeThe HTA programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care.The journal is indexed in NHS Evidence via its abstracts included in MEDLINE and its Technology Assessment Reports inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. HTA research is also an important source of evidence for National Screening Committee (NSC) policy decisions.For more information about the HTA programme please visit the website: www.hta.ac.uk/ This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 08/53/34. The contractual start date was in May 2009. The draft report began editorial review in May 2012 and was accepted for publication in August 2012. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ...

show abstract

Section: Agesupporting

confidence: 77%

A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities

Willner

Rose²,

Jahoda³

et al. 2013

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because of progressive reductions in perceived time horizons, aging would lead to increased prioritization of goals related to emotional well-being, resulting in increased efforts to allocate cognitive resources towards positive information and away from negative onepositivity effect (Carstensen & Mikels, 2005;Charles & Carstensen, 2007Mather & Carstensen, 2005;Reed & Carstensen, 2012;Samanez-Larkin & Carstensen, 2011). Findings that age effects are smaller for the recognition of happiness as compared to negative emotions are often interpreted within this framework (Laukka & Juslin, 2007;Mill et al, 2009;Mitchell et al, 2011;Riediger, Voelkle, Ebner, & Lindenberger, 2011;Williams et al, 2006). However, the interaction between valence and age is not consistently obtained (e.g., Isaacowitz et al, 2007;Lambrecht et al, 2012;Ruffman et al, 2008).…”

Section: Aging and Emotion Recognitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Age and Musical Expertise Influence Emotion Recognition in Music

Castro

Lima

2014

Music Perception

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

WE INVESTIGATED HOW AGE AND MUSICAL EXPERTISE influence emotion recognition in music. Musically trained and untrained participants from two age cohorts, young and middle-aged adults (N ¼ 80), were presented with music excerpts expressing happiness, peacefulness, sadness, and fear/threat. Participants rated how much each excerpt expressed the four emotions on 10-point scales. The intended emotions were consistently perceived, but responses varied across groups. Advancing age was associated with selective decrements in the recognition of sadness and fear/threat, a finding consistent with previous research (Lima & Castro, 2011a); the recognition of happiness and peacefulness remained stable. Years of music training were associated with enhanced recognition accuracy. These effects were independent of domain-general cognitive abilities and personality traits, but they were echoed in differences in how efficiently music structural cues (e.g., tempo, mode) were relied upon. Thus, age and musical expertise are experiential factors explaining individual variability in emotion recognition in music.

show abstract

“…However, a number of studies have found that others have a more difficult time reading the emotional expressions of older adults (Ebner and Johnson, 2009;Malatesta et al, 1987;Riediger et al, 2011). There is some evidence to suggest that this may be somewhat attenuated in older adult perceivers -that is, older adults may be better at reading the expressions of other older adults (Malatesta et al, 1987;Riediger et al, 2011).…”

Section: Age Differences In Emotional Expressionmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…In a study that examined perceptions of posed expressions, older adults attributed less negative emotion to expressions of anger, disgust, fear, and sadness and attributed more unintended positive emotion to these negative expressions (Riediger et al, 2011). Similarly, other studies have found that older adults are poorer at detecting negative emotions in faces than younger adults, whereas there is no age difference in perception of happy faces (Ebner and Johnson, 2009;Ebner et al, 2010).…”

Section: Age Differences In Emotional Expressionmentioning

confidence: 96%