2003
DOI: 10.3109/14992020309074649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond hearing aid fitting: improving communication for older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
93
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intervention program that is the focus of the study described here is called Active Communication Education (ACE) and is designed for older people with hearing impairment (Hickson & Worrall, 2003). Many older people do not access traditional audiological services and those who do often receive only partial satisfaction with a service that focuses on hearing aid fitting alone.…”
Section: © Taylor and Francis 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention program that is the focus of the study described here is called Active Communication Education (ACE) and is designed for older people with hearing impairment (Hickson & Worrall, 2003). Many older people do not access traditional audiological services and those who do often receive only partial satisfaction with a service that focuses on hearing aid fitting alone.…”
Section: © Taylor and Francis 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of VA audiology programs have started offering group hearing aid fitting and/or follow-up appointments. While a number of studies suggest that group aural rehabilitation visits can produce equivalent or better patient outcomes when offered as a supplement to standard care [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], only limited observational evidence suggests that group follow-up visits yield hearing aid patient outcomes (e.g., hearing handicap, satisfaction, adherence) that are at least as good as individual visits [20]. No studies have been published that compare group and individual hearing aid fitting visits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies were performed on a participant pool of less than 200; however, a few studies were very large scale, with data collected mostly with the MarkeTrak Satisfaction Survey (eg, Kochkin 2000a). Studies by Dillon et al (1999) and Parving et al (2003) included more than 4000 and 14000 participants, respectively.• Most participants were elderly, with a mean age of 65 or above.• Four studies examined satisfaction in new users, a few studies compared results from experienced and new users (eg, Cox and Alexander, 2000;Kochkin, 2000a), but others did not discriminate between these two types of users (eg, Gatehouse, 1994;Hickson et al, 1999). A few other studies evaluated experienced users only (eg, Newman and Sandridge, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased age and hearing difficulty together are related to greater satisfaction with benefit, cost, and service, and with image-related issues (Hosford-Dunn and Halpern, 2001). Studies that have investigated gender effects have mostly found none (Hickson et al, 1999;Jerram and Purdy, 2001). Female participants were slightly more satisfied than male participants in the study by Brooks and Hallam (1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%