Beyond Hip Fractures: Other Fragility Fractures’ Associated Mortality, Functional and Economic Importance: A 2-year-Follow-up.

Abstract

Background Hip fractures are well researched in orthogeriatric literature. Equivalent investigations for fragility-associated periprosthetic and periosteosynthetic femoral, ankle joint, pelvic ring, and rib fractures are still rare. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mortality, functional outcome, and socioeconomic parameters associated to the upper-mentioned fragility fractures prospectively in a 2-year follow-up. Methods Over the course of a year, all periprosthetic and periosteosynthetic femoral fractures (PPFF), ankle joint fractures (AJ), pelvic ring fractures (PR), and rib fractures (RF), that were treated on a co-managed orthogeriatric ward, were assessed. Parker Mobility Score (PMS), Barthel Index (BI), place of residence, and care level were recorded. After 2 years, patients and/or relatives were contacted by mailed questionnaires or phone calls in order to calculate mortality and reevaluate the mentioned parameters. Results Follow-up rate was 77.7%, assessing 87 patients overall. The relative mortality risk was significantly increased for PR (2.9 (95% CI: 1.5–5.4)) and PPFF (3.5 (95% CI: 1.2–5.8)) but not for RF (1.5 (95% CI: 0.4–2.6)) and AJ (2.0 (95% CI: 0.0–4.0)). Every fracture group except AJ showed significantly higher BI on average at follow-up. PMS was, respectively, reduced on average for PR and RF insignificantly, but significantly for PPFF and AJ in comparison to pre-hospital values. 10.0–27.3% (each group) of patients had to leave their homes permanently; care levels were raised in 30.0–61.5% of cases. Discussion This investigation provides a perspective for further larger examinations. PR and PPFF correlate with significant increased mortality risk. Patients suffering from PPFF, PR, and RF were able to significantly recover in their activities of daily living. AJ and PPFF conclude in significant reduction of PMS after 2 years. Conclusion Any fragility fracture has its impact on mortality, function, and socioeconomic aspects and shall not be underestimated. Despite some fractures not being the most common, they are still present in daily practice.

The precise reconstruction of the center of rotation in total hip arthroplasty after femoral neck fractures - a clinically crucial challenge

“…Even if not all abilities assessed by the Barthel Index are related to the functionality of the hip joint, experience shows that limited mobility and functionality of the lower extremity affects the patient in many ways and in other areas of life. Data shows that limited mobility aggravates comorbidities and increases mortality [9][10][11]. Advanced age, low preoperative functional status, ability to participate in physical therapy and blood loss appear to be particularly outcome-relevant in the management of hip fractures [12].…”

A formula for predicting postoperative functional decline using routine medical data in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery

“…The frequency of postoperative functional decline in the elderly is higher than that in younger generations 3. Decreased patient function leads to increased caregiver burden and social costs 4–7. In addition, an interview survey of elderly people suffering from serious illnesses reported that about 75% of patients who are expected to have severe functional deterioration do not want treatment even if the burden is light 8.…”