Beyond ideological platitudes: socialism and psychiatry in Eastern Europe

Abstract

For both contemporaneous commentators and historians, psychiatry within what was Communist Europe has largely been discussed through the prism of politics and ideology. Recently, scholars have begun to debate the extent to which psychiatric practices within post-WWII Eastern Europe were beholden to the ideological aspirations of the political elite. This paper enters into these debates by suggesting the need for more nuance in how historians analyse the relationship between ideology and psychiatry in this context. Specifically, it argues that there is a need to differentiate between psychiatric practices that were socialist by design-where professional knowledge was theoretically guided by ideological considerations-and those that were socialist by default-where practices were shaped by the socialist context without being meaningfully inspired by ideology. In order to demonstrate these distinctions, this paper reflects upon psychiatric developments within Communist Yugoslavia (1945-1991). By drawing a clearer distinction between "socialist by design" and "socialism by default", it becomes easier to reconnect Eastern Europe to the broader historiography of twentieth century psychiatry, while simultaneously providing new insights into the experience of state-sponsored Communism.

Trust and Support for Cancer Research Biobanks: Insights from Cancer Patients in Poland

“…Similarly, in many post-communist countries, which are often described as “low-trust societies” [ 85 ], people have a strong sense of mistrust towards the state and tend to act in opposition to social institutions [ 86 , 87 ]. Moreover, research shows that lack of trust or distrust towards the state, scientists, and healthcare institutions was further undermined by mass involuntary vaccinations [ 88 , 89 ] and coercive psychiatric abuse for political purposes [ 90 , 91 ]. Consequently, civil society is weak in those countries and people do not engage actively in social organizations and elections, and their trust in science is also relatively low.…”

The New Socialist Citizen and ‘Forgetting’ Authoritarianism: Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis, and Revolution in Socialist Yugoslavia

“…shaped by necessity by the socialist context-but not deeply grounded in socialist ideology and therefore not fundamentally different from its West European or North American counterparts. 49 However, as the Yugoslav case demonstrates, East European 'psy' disciplines could become radically reformed as a result of their interpenetration with Marxist intellectual frameworks, and informed by broader socialist or revolutionary principles. This was by no means always a sign of political authoritarianism and professional subordination: Marxist psychiatry in its Yugoslav version developed original emancipatory approaches, even on the global level, and engaged in innovative and experimental projects.…”

Discursive exploitation or actual impact: Mental health anti-stigma campaigns in the post-communist area

“…A unique scheme for the classification of this condition was introduced by its leader prof. A. Snezhevsky and his colleagues. Even the mildest behavioral change facilitated the application of this diagnosis especially to justify the involuntary confinement of the state's political enemies [9,10,12,13].…”