“…ITRs have been subject to widespread criticisms on a number of grounds: their overzealous focus on price stability at the expense of unemployment and growth, anchored in the assumptions of the long‐run neutrality of money and the natural rate of unemployment, or the non‐accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU); their one‐sided interpretation of inflation as a demand pull phenomenon; and the problematic role of the short‐term interest rate as the main monetary policy instrument (Arestis and Sawyer, ; Argitis, 2008–09; Epstein and Yeldan, ; FitzGerald, ; Gabor, ; Rochon and Rossi, ). Given the distinct structural characteristics of DECs, an additional problem of conducting ITRs in these countries is the necessary subordination of the exchange rate as economic policy instrument (Cordero, ; Epstein and Yeldan, ; FitzGerald, ; Galindo and Ros, ; Vernengo, ). Indeed, empirical evidence shows that despite their official ITRs cum floating exchange rates, DEC central banks have been intervening heavily in their foreign exchange (FX) markets, in times of both appreciation and depreciation (Calvo and Reinhart, ; Levy‐Yeyati and Sturzenegger, ; McKinnon and Schnabl, ).…”