2009
DOI: 10.1017/s1355617709990543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Laterality: A Critical Assessment of Research on the Neural Basis of Metaphor

Abstract: Metaphors are a fundamental aspect of human cognition. The major neuropsychological hypothesis that metaphoric processing relies primarily on the right hemisphere is not confirmed consistently. We propose ways to advance our understanding of the neuropsychology of metaphor that go beyond simple laterality. Neuropsychological studies need to more carefully control confounding lexical and sentential factors, and consider the role of different parts of speech as they are extended metaphorically. They need to inco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
53
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the relationship between how apt we find a metaphor, our familiarity with it, and the ease and means with which we understand it remains unsettled-is the career of metaphor model sufficient to account for aptness effects (Bowdle & Gentner, 2005;Jones & Estes, 2006)? How can existing models of metaphor comprehension, based on studies of nominal metaphors, be tested or extended to account for predicate metaphors Schmidt et al, 2010)? How does linguistic context modulate the role of such factors as familiarity and figurativeness (Giora, 1997)?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the relationship between how apt we find a metaphor, our familiarity with it, and the ease and means with which we understand it remains unsettled-is the career of metaphor model sufficient to account for aptness effects (Bowdle & Gentner, 2005;Jones & Estes, 2006)? How can existing models of metaphor comprehension, based on studies of nominal metaphors, be tested or extended to account for predicate metaphors Schmidt et al, 2010)? How does linguistic context modulate the role of such factors as familiarity and figurativeness (Giora, 1997)?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings, and recognizing the important role that metaphor plays in emotional language (see (Kövecses, 2003)), Elvevåg et al (2011) hypothesize that metaphor production disturbances in patients with schizophrenia are deeply tied to "emotional" language (i.e., language with high affective polarity). However, it should be noted in this regard that most work on metaphor processing has focused on cortical regions involved (Chen et al, 2008;Schmidt et al, 2010;Benedek et al, 2014).…”
Section: Metaphor Affect and Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, it would also be unwise to mix these kinds of conventional metaphors (close to literal meaning) with more metaphoric word pairs, without explicitly examining "conventionality" as a factor. Moreover, in these studies, metaphoric word pairs are presented without a sentential context; thus, word-level investigations are limited to familiar metaphorical relationships that can be interpreted without a context (Schmidt, Kranjec, Cardillo, & Chatterjee, 2009). The processing of single metaphorically employed words may represent a different cognitive task than processing sentential metaphors and, therefore, reveal different lateralization effects.…”
Section: Challenges In Synthesizing the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%