2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.98.115012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond R(D(*)) with the general type-III 2HDM for

Abstract: We review the parameter regions allowed by measurements of R(D ( * ) ) and by a theoretical limit on B(B c → τ ν) in terms of generic scalar and pseudoscalar new physics couplings, g s and g p . We then use these regions as constraints to predict the ranges for additional observables in b → cτ ν including the differential decay distributions dΓ/dq 2 ; the ratios R(J/ψ) and R(Λ c ); and the tau-lepton polarisation in B → D ( ) τ ν, with emphasis on the CP violating normal polarisation. Finally we map the allowe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(97 reference statements)
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This setup is again motivated by models with extra charged scalars. However, here a generic flavor structure is needed to make O L S the dominant operator [122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131]…”
Section: Analysis Of Different Np Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This setup is again motivated by models with extra charged scalars. However, here a generic flavor structure is needed to make O L S the dominant operator [122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131]…”
Section: Analysis Of Different Np Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, B factories and the LHCb experiment have reported several anomalies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] that find no satisfying explanation in the flavour structure and interactions supported by the standard model (SM) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The interpretation of these signals in term of new physics faces, as well, several difficulties, in particular the simultaneous explanation of the R K ( * ) and R D ( * ) measurements proves undoubtedly challenging for the implications on further precision observables that rule out the underlying proposals [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-Higgs-Doublet Models (2HDM) have indeed proven to be interesting models featuring a rich phenomenology concerning collider physics [8][9][10], axion models [11,12], baryogenesis [13][14][15], flavor physics [16][17][18][19][20], among others [21,22]. Several versions of 2HDM have been proposed in the literature trying to improve the original proposal in some theoretical aspects, via the inclusion of dark matter [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and neutrino masses [33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%