Beyond privacy and exposure: ethical issues within citizen-facing analytics

Abstract

We discuss the governing forces for analytics, especially concerning citizens' behaviours and their transactions, that depend on which of three of operation an institution is in (corporate, public sector/government and academic). We argue that aspirations and missions also differ by sphere even as digital spaces have drawn these spheres ever closer together. We propose that citizens' expectations and implicit permissions for any exploitation of their data require the perception of a fair balance of benefits, which should be transparent (accessible to citizens) and justifiable. We point out that within the most analytics does not concern identity, targeted marketing nor any direct interference with individual citizens; but instead it supports strategic decision-making, where the data are effectively anonymous. With the three spheres we discuss the nature of models deployed in analytics, including 'black-box' modelling uncheckable by a human mind, and the need to track the provenance and workings or models. We also examine the recent evolution of personal data, where some behaviours, or tokens, identifying individuals (unique and yet non-random) are partially and jointly owned by other individuals that are themselves connected. We consider the ability of heavily and lightly regulated sectors to increase access or to stifle innovation. We also call for clear and inclusive definitions of 'data science and analytics', avoiding the narrow claims of those in technical sub-sectors or sub-themes. Finally, we examine some examples of unethical and abusive practices. We argue for an ethical responsibility to be placed upon professional data scientists to avoid abuses in the future.This article is part of the themed issue 'The ethical impact of data science'.

A Non-Expert's Introduction to Data Ethics for Mathematicians

“…In universities in the United States, if you are working with personal data, you need to check with your institution's Internal Review Board (IRB) to ensure that you are conducting your research in an ethical way. Universities in other countries, private companies, government laboratories, and other organizations often have bodies that are similar to IRBs, but the procedures and especially the specific details are very different [Gri16]. A university IRB may tell you that you do not need to submit a formal application to get a research project approved, or they may tell you that you do.…”

Deep Learning: An Introduction for Applied Mathematicians

“…When we have a large number of parameters and a large number of training points, computing the gradient vector (14) at every iteration of the steepest descent method (12) can be prohibitively expensive. A much cheaper alternative is to replace the mean of the individual gradients over all training points by the gradient at a single, randomly chosen, training point.…”

“…However, the increasing influence of black-box technologies is naturally causing concerns in many quarters. The recent articles [7,14] raise several relevant issues and illustrate them with concrete examples. They also highlight the particular challenges arising from massively-parameterized artificial neural networks.…”

A data management framework for strategic urban planning using blue-green infrastructure

“…At the same time, more and more research indicates that improved access to data, for instance hazard model outputs, can stimulate dialogue between different stakeholders, like modellers, risk managers, and urban policy makers (Zerger and Wealands, 2004). However, a major concern is that increased use of informatics may widen the gaps in power and political voice between experts and non-experts (Viitanen and Kingston, 2014;Grindrod, 2016). With the development of smart green cities, where information systems are out-sourced, ethical assessments and consideration of consequences of data collection systems will grow in importance.…”