2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72606-7_103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Proportional Fair: Designing Robust Wireless Schedulers

Abstract: Abstract. Proportional Fair (PF), a frequently used scheduling algorithm in 3G wireless networks, can unnecessarily starve "well-behaved" users in practice. One of the main causes behind PF-induced starvation is its inability to distinguish between users who are backlogged and users who are not. In this paper, we describe how a simple parallel PF instance can mitigate such starvation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Parallel PF: We propose the following Parallel PF (PPF) algorithm, which was first introduced in [1]. PPF uses a backlog-unaware scheduler instance only to remove the undue advantage an "on-off" user receives at the beginning of all possible "on" periods.…”
Section: A Combating "On-off" Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) Parallel PF: We propose the following Parallel PF (PPF) algorithm, which was first introduced in [1]. PPF uses a backlog-unaware scheduler instance only to remove the undue advantage an "on-off" user receives at the beginning of all possible "on" periods.…”
Section: A Combating "On-off" Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of these, we identify the reason why PF can induce starvation and propose mechanisms to prevent it. The specific mechanisms we propose are the use of a parallel scheduler instance, which was introduced in [1], with a simple adaptive initialization and a practical, adaptive quantile-based algorithm inspired by PF. Using extensive simulation experiments, we show that our proposed mechanisms do eliminate starvation in each of the respective scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%