2009
DOI: 10.1080/02698590903007279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Reduction: Philosophy of Mind and Post‐Reductionist Philosophy of Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The judgments regarding aspects of the unification of psychological knowledge are conceptually heterogeneous. Studies in the philosophy of science that deal with psychological knowledge debate the scientific status of the discipline, the application of non-psychological theoretical and methodological means, strategies in research, reductionism controversy, unification perspective (Bechtel & Richardson, 2010;Chemero & Silberstein, 2008;Chiari, 2009;Churchland, 1984;Gijsbers, 2007;Horst, 2007). The debate is getting more complex and sophisticated, but so far without significant results for overcoming the fragmentation of theoretical psychology.…”
Section: The Idea Of Unificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The judgments regarding aspects of the unification of psychological knowledge are conceptually heterogeneous. Studies in the philosophy of science that deal with psychological knowledge debate the scientific status of the discipline, the application of non-psychological theoretical and methodological means, strategies in research, reductionism controversy, unification perspective (Bechtel & Richardson, 2010;Chemero & Silberstein, 2008;Chiari, 2009;Churchland, 1984;Gijsbers, 2007;Horst, 2007). The debate is getting more complex and sophisticated, but so far without significant results for overcoming the fragmentation of theoretical psychology.…”
Section: The Idea Of Unificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also reasonable to believe that most clear-thinking transhumanists share this view. But what if we push anti-reductionism to its extreme limit (Horst, 2007), push it to a point where what we call "human nature" is simply a way of speaking that makes sense, but does not refer to anything that exists? 10 Andy Clark (2003) takes this very position and argues there is no essential human nature.…”
Section: Human Nature Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%