2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Risk Considerations: Where and How Can a Debate About Non-safety Related Issues of Genome Editing in Agriculture Take Place?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the topic of regulation and labelling is also rated more important by these organisations. Bechtold (2018) argues that a wise labelling strategy could open up the possibility of focusing the discussion on shared values (e.g. protection of the environment, human health) which could be achieved with the help of genome editing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the topic of regulation and labelling is also rated more important by these organisations. Bechtold (2018) argues that a wise labelling strategy could open up the possibility of focusing the discussion on shared values (e.g. protection of the environment, human health) which could be achieved with the help of genome editing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a technology cannot be viewed in isolation but needs to be contextualised by considering the socio‐cultural settings surrounding the respective debate (Chavas & Nauges, 2020; Lassoued et al, 2018). In the case of genome editing, the initial framing of the GMO debate and the judgement of the ECJ set the stage for a risk‐focused discourse (Bechtold, 2018). This is also highlighted by the fact that the so‐called precautionary principle is frequently used within the public debate to question the safety of genome‐edited plants from the outset (Lassoued et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in the European Union, genome edited crops are currently subject to regulations as genetically modified (GM) organisms (Callaway, 2018). Although safety issues regarding the application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology must be examined by scientific means and considering the associated practical and societal aspects (Bechtold, 2018), regulatory standpoint in favor of this promising technology will assist in its proper dissemination leading to better crop management.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%