2002
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2002.800471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond stabilizer codes .I. Nice error bases

Abstract: Nice error bases have been introduced by Knill as a generalization of the Pauli basis. These bases are shown to be projective representations of finite groups. We classify all nice error bases of small degree, and all nice error bases with abelian index groups. We show that in general an index group of a nice error basis is necessarily solvable. KeywordsQuantum computing, nice error bases, generalizations of the Pauli basis, projective group representations, quantum error correcting codes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they generate an error group G 1 of size pq 2 with center ζ(G 1 ) = ωI (see [18,19]). Any element of G 1 can uniquely be written as ω γ X α Z β where γ ∈ {0, .…”
Section: Unitary Error Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they generate an error group G 1 of size pq 2 with center ζ(G 1 ) = ωI (see [18,19]). Any element of G 1 can uniquely be written as ω γ X α Z β where γ ∈ {0, .…”
Section: Unitary Error Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also a series of interesting extensions to non-stabilizer codes [14], [15] with the aim of increasing the coding capabilities of quantum codes. For instance, a type of non-additive codes can beat the ratio 1:5 of perfect linear codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our codes differ from the "Clifford codes" associated with "nice error bases" as proposed by Knill [38] and developed by Klappenecker and Rötteler [32,34,35]. The most significant difference is that the KKR approach does not yield new binary codes.…”
Section: Quantum Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 92%