2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the buildingcentric approach: A vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
68
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, actors could maintain and change the technical systems; institutions would guide actors' perceptions and activities [53]. Another feature is the open systems issue, indicating that the socio-technical systems have mutual interaction with the social, regulatory and geographic contexts [56][57][58].…”
Section: Socio-technical Systems Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, actors could maintain and change the technical systems; institutions would guide actors' perceptions and activities [53]. Another feature is the open systems issue, indicating that the socio-technical systems have mutual interaction with the social, regulatory and geographic contexts [56][57][58].…”
Section: Socio-technical Systems Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of behavior change and idea diffusion suggests that change is brought about by a combination of factors in an on-going process of adaptation and learning. In the building industry, the use of sustainability rating tools has been identified as contributing to the "greening" of industry knowledge, practices, and products [11][12][13]. These factors raise the question of the broader contribution made by the infrastructure sustainability rating tools.…”
Section: Study Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of sustainability rating tools in the built environment began in the 1990s and 2000s [10], with building rating tools such as BREEAM (UK), LEED (USA), and Green Star (Australia and New Zealand) now recognized for contributing strongly to the green building revolution [11][12][13]. In the early 2000s, studies highlighted the lack of similar tools for infrastructure beyond buildings (e.g., road, rail, energy, and water systems) [14][15][16].…”
Section: Background On the Rating Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of green building has now been widely accepted to address the growing market demand for environmental sustainability in the building industry [14]. As such, the evaluation is mainly from an environmental perspective, which is often criticized because sustainability covers the triple bottom line, including economic, social and environmental criteria [32]. On the other hand, sustainable neighborhood design centers on the development of community, which is a distinctly different level from buildings in urban development and has its own characteristics, which may include accessibility and land-use diversity [33,34].…”
Section: Green Neighborhood Development and Green Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%