2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10672-006-9024-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Business Case for Diversity in Organizations

Abstract: Many organizations and institutions are spending extensive time, money, and resources to justify a focus on diversity. In this paper, we argue that, instead of justifying demographic diversity, the more appropriate focus is on properly managing the processes and outcomes of a diverse workforce. Demographic diversity in the workplace is a reality. In terms of both composition and sheer numbers, the workforce today is more demographically diverse than it has ever been, and there is every indication that it will … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, individual tendencies, incentives and short-term benefits may be misaligned with the objective of an inclusive diverse workplace, and may instead undermine the potential benefits of diversity through exclusionary behaviors and practices (e.g., homophily, discrimination). On this basis, some have argued that the general discourse needs to move beyond discussing diversity in the abstract and start to specify the ways in which organizations can leverage diversity for positive effect (Davidson, 2011;O'Leary & Weathington, 2006). Others have offered a communicative approach to managing diversity that encourages the expression of diverse voices (das Neves & Mele, 2013;Trittin & Schoeneborn, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, individual tendencies, incentives and short-term benefits may be misaligned with the objective of an inclusive diverse workplace, and may instead undermine the potential benefits of diversity through exclusionary behaviors and practices (e.g., homophily, discrimination). On this basis, some have argued that the general discourse needs to move beyond discussing diversity in the abstract and start to specify the ways in which organizations can leverage diversity for positive effect (Davidson, 2011;O'Leary & Weathington, 2006). Others have offered a communicative approach to managing diversity that encourages the expression of diverse voices (das Neves & Mele, 2013;Trittin & Schoeneborn, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combine mean score of 4.10 for all HR diversity management practices is significantly higher than the 1999 mean score of 3.83. In Australia, the concept of diversity is no longer new and the debate about the business case for diversity appears to be having a positive effect (O'Leary and Weathington 2006;Shalo 2005). Australia is no longer a sheltered economy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extra care must be taken to create a work environment free of unfavorable perceptions of unearned privilege in promotion decisions. Any perceived unfairness or inequity can cause undue distress that can lead to psychological or behavioral outcomes such as vandalism, lower productivity, and dissatisfaction (O'Leary and Weathington 2006). Fairness associated with selection and promotion decisions impacts not only the hired or rejected applicant, but also co-workers and customers (Gilliland 1993;Gilliland and Hale 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%