Exercise-Cognition Interaction 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800778-5.00004-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Catecholamines Hypothesis for an Acute Exercise–Cognition Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
128
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
4
128
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent review [1], we examined the efficacy of the catecholamines hypothesis [2] in 46 providing an underlying rationale for empirical research results concerning the acute exercise-47 cognition interaction effect. We concluded that the hypothesis, as it stands, could not account for 48 (a) improvements in cognition during exercise intensities and/or durations, which did not induce 49 increases in plasma concentrations of catecholamines; (b) the failure to unequivocally 50 demonstrate an inverted-U effect, with respect to cognitive testing at rest, and during moderate 51 and heavy exercise; (c) improvements in cognitive performance following heavy exercise that 52 has been shown in some research; (d) nor why different task types appear to be affected 53 differently.…”
Section: Introduction 45mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review [1], we examined the efficacy of the catecholamines hypothesis [2] in 46 providing an underlying rationale for empirical research results concerning the acute exercise-47 cognition interaction effect. We concluded that the hypothesis, as it stands, could not account for 48 (a) improvements in cognition during exercise intensities and/or durations, which did not induce 49 increases in plasma concentrations of catecholamines; (b) the failure to unequivocally 50 demonstrate an inverted-U effect, with respect to cognitive testing at rest, and during moderate 51 and heavy exercise; (c) improvements in cognitive performance following heavy exercise that 52 has been shown in some research; (d) nor why different task types appear to be affected 53 differently.…”
Section: Introduction 45mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been consistent findings showing that exercise of a short to moderate duration (≤30 min) 11) and moderate intensity (40-70% V ・ O2max) 12) improves executive function [13][14][15][16][17] ; however, when the exercise duration exceeds 60 min or when the intensity is >70% V ・ O2max, the findings on the effect of exercise on executive function have been controversial. Dietrich et al 18) reported that executive function was impaired during approximately 63 min of running at 75% maximal heart rate, whereas Hogervorst et al 19) demonstrated that executive function was enhanced (based on a shorter time to finish the Stroop interference task) after 60 min of cycling at 75% maximal work capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Dietrich et al 18) reported that executive function was impaired during approximately 63 min of running at 75% maximal heart rate, whereas Hogervorst et al 19) demonstrated that executive function was enhanced (based on a shorter time to finish the Stroop interference task) after 60 min of cycling at 75% maximal work capacity. Research investigating the effect of a sustained high-intensity exercise on executive function is lacking 11) , and whether such exercise can enhance or dete-*Correspondence: ksanada@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp riorate executive function remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations