2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-013-9183-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Ecofact: Toward a Social Paleoethnobotany in Mesoamerica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diet and subsistence patterns contribute a substantial amount of information for understanding people's lifeways. However, anthropologists have moved past attempts to determine which foods were featured in social organizations in favor of investigating the function of food as a part of the semiotic system within particular socio-cultural frameworks (Appadurai 1981;Morehart and Morell-Hart 2015;Morell-Hart 2012). Worldwide, more consistent applications and advances in archaeobotany have enabled archaeologists to address research problems regarding plant domestication, economies, subsistence strategies, human introductions of new plants, and the role of foods during social events (Barton and Torrence 2015;Henry et al 2014;Liu et al 2018;Pagán-Jiménez et al 2015;Pearsall 2018;Piperno 2011;Zarrillo et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diet and subsistence patterns contribute a substantial amount of information for understanding people's lifeways. However, anthropologists have moved past attempts to determine which foods were featured in social organizations in favor of investigating the function of food as a part of the semiotic system within particular socio-cultural frameworks (Appadurai 1981;Morehart and Morell-Hart 2015;Morell-Hart 2012). Worldwide, more consistent applications and advances in archaeobotany have enabled archaeologists to address research problems regarding plant domestication, economies, subsistence strategies, human introductions of new plants, and the role of foods during social events (Barton and Torrence 2015;Henry et al 2014;Liu et al 2018;Pagán-Jiménez et al 2015;Pearsall 2018;Piperno 2011;Zarrillo et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis, we use ideas from political ecology and recent scholarship on eventful archaeology to position social and political action within the broader environment. Specifically, we view political ecology as research that focuses on the integration “of biophysical and political‐economic phenomena” as suggested by Brannstrom (, 75), as well as “negotiations of social relationships and differential access to social resources” (Bauer, Johansen, and Bauer , 8) (see also Morehart and Morell‐Hart ; Thompson ). While political ecology provides a necessary focus on not just social relations, but also the environment, it does not provide a specific direction or method on how to conduct such analyses.…”
Section: Event Action and Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This marks a continuation of archaeological attention to topics that have most frequently been considered by cultural anthropologists. The social analysis of food and systems of cuisine relative to social structure, identity, domestic settings, feasting, and culture change have all received frequent attention (Metheny and Beaudry ; Morehart and Morell‐Hart ; Pearson et al. ; Wilkins and Nadeau ).…”
Section: Reexamination and Reframingmentioning
confidence: 99%