2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI): Developing a Natural Space Index for population-level health research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important limitation of the GVI is that it only captures greenness from the street view, and is unable to characterize greenness in participants’ properties, particularly their backyards. Other related work to enhance measures of greenness that is ongoing includes efforts by investigators in Vancouver, Canada to develop the Natural Space Index [40]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important limitation of the GVI is that it only captures greenness from the street view, and is unable to characterize greenness in participants’ properties, particularly their backyards. Other related work to enhance measures of greenness that is ongoing includes efforts by investigators in Vancouver, Canada to develop the Natural Space Index [40]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A methodological strength is the way in which we modeled greenery, namely by coupling cutting-edge deep learning with street view data. Neither streetscape greenery nor NDVI is affected by people's self-reporting and subjective perception [57], though it raises questions about the actual greenery use [58]. Both measures also do not convey information about the quality of greenery [58].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Self-reports may better account for the actual interaction with greenspace, and therefore reduce misclassification in remote sensing exposure assessments, which is due to some well-known issues with GIS-derived metrics like the NDVI and land use indices (e.g., poor discrimination between types of greenspace and disregarding their actual quality, accessibility, and visibility from pedestrian’s point of view) [ 2 , 19 ]. Some remedies include new indices capturing multiple aspects of greenspace by integrating information from different sources, including remote sensing, local land use databases, private ownership data, and quality appraisals [ 42 ]; using GPS technology to track participants’ movement and assess greenspace along their actual travel routes [ 43 ]; and calculating visible vegetation from geotagged eye-level panoramic images [ 44 ]. However, perceptual measures not only compensate for the lack of precision of vegetation indices and land use-derived green space metrics, but also access the mental representation of residents’ living environment, considering individual differences, such as the attention that people pay to their surroundings, their preference for specific attributes involved in the appraisal of greenspace quality, personal salience, and intentions to engage in particular greenspace-related behaviors (e.g., “green sport”) [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%