2017
DOI: 10.1177/0309132517747315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the sham of the emancipatory Enlightenment: Rethinking the relationship of Indigenous epistemologies, knowledges, and geography through decolonizing paths

Abstract: This article contributes to the current debate on decolonizing geography. It explores rethinking the relationship of Indigenous epistemologies, knowledges, and geography from Indigenous perspectives. After deconstructing the Enlightenment as an illusory way towards emancipation and critically exploring the heritage of geography regarding Indigenous peoples, this paper examines the Indigenous epistemologies that are considered counter-discourses that challenge western ‘regimes of truth’. It approaches Indigenou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It relies on strong relationships with community members and the establishment of partnerships with research participants which actively engage in knowledge creation processes (Kovach, 2009). CBR acknowledges multiple sources and ways of generating learning, including traditional and indigenous epistemologies (Clement, 2019;Howard, 2016). CBR seeks diverse voices, equitable and collaborative relationships with research participants and supports empowering relations benefiting the individual and the partnership levels (Hutchinson & Lovell, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It relies on strong relationships with community members and the establishment of partnerships with research participants which actively engage in knowledge creation processes (Kovach, 2009). CBR acknowledges multiple sources and ways of generating learning, including traditional and indigenous epistemologies (Clement, 2019;Howard, 2016). CBR seeks diverse voices, equitable and collaborative relationships with research participants and supports empowering relations benefiting the individual and the partnership levels (Hutchinson & Lovell, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…English was introduced as the language of Our experiences growing up are by no way unique to our city, but speak to one of the many ways that people in Lalibela develop a deep spiritual relationship to the churches and the town itself. Like other indigenous perspectives, rather than being conceived as a tabula rasa, waiting to be authored or acted upon by human beings, the traditional beliefs of Ethiopians understand place to have agency that can impose demands on human beings (Deloria 2003;Basso 1996;Smith 2005;Clement 2017). As Vanessa Watts has written, "land is alive and thinking" (Watts 2013, p. 21).…”
Section: Tabot Is Understood Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion in the following pages is also closely associated with the move to decolonize social sciences by centring Indigenous ontologies, naming lived realities which are not accounted for in dominant discourses of violence and colonialism (Holmes et al, 2015) and recognizing that the shadows of colonial oppression are always 'there' and still present in everyday forms of marginalization (Clement, 2019). As examined in the next section, the evolution of the Guarani-Kaiowa struggle and their ontological experience of being a unique Indigenous people contain elements of socio-spatial injustices that are nonetheless shared with the class-ethnicity nexus of other subaltern groups around the world and which also helps to produce the world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%