2017
DOI: 10.1525/irqr.2017.10.3.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Talk-Back

Abstract: Reflecting on my own experiences with talk-backs and audience responses, this manuscript uses metaphor to map the functions of autoethnographic performance critique. Through an exploration of vulnerability within performance, I turn to three key areas: theoretical accessibility, performativity, and accountability in order to chart how to engage in critique of performance autoethnography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In connection to this, Esmeralda Rodriguez et al (2017) discussed how, by using autoethnography, a writer can engage in a method of "assemblage" wherein the vast layered multiplicities of a focus area can be "juxtaposed" in such a way as to illuminate one's evolving and precarious relationship to the phenomena. Desireé Rowe (2017) reflected that the "autoethnographic mapping of the object, then, allows for us to unfold the intersections of stories and bodies" (p. 230). The queersubjective, affective relationship that is intermingled in this research is an embodiment of the process described by Baker (2013), wherein "queer becoming is a practice and/or process through which queer subjects intervene in their identities or subjectivities and remake themselves; also, a resistant practice, a practice of liberty" (p. 360).…”
Section: Queering Archive Affect and Placementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In connection to this, Esmeralda Rodriguez et al (2017) discussed how, by using autoethnography, a writer can engage in a method of "assemblage" wherein the vast layered multiplicities of a focus area can be "juxtaposed" in such a way as to illuminate one's evolving and precarious relationship to the phenomena. Desireé Rowe (2017) reflected that the "autoethnographic mapping of the object, then, allows for us to unfold the intersections of stories and bodies" (p. 230). The queersubjective, affective relationship that is intermingled in this research is an embodiment of the process described by Baker (2013), wherein "queer becoming is a practice and/or process through which queer subjects intervene in their identities or subjectivities and remake themselves; also, a resistant practice, a practice of liberty" (p. 360).…”
Section: Queering Archive Affect and Placementioning
confidence: 99%