2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.72.125004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the thin-wall approximation: Precise numerical computation of prefactors in false vacuum decay

Abstract: We present a general numerical method for computing precisely the false vacuum decay rate, including the prefactor due to quantum fluctuations about the classical bounce solution, in a selfinteracting scalar field theory modeling the process of nucleation in four dimensional spacetime.This technique does not rely on the thin-wall approximation. The method is based on the GelfandYaglom approach to determinants of differential operators, suitably extended to higher dimensions using angular momentum cutoff regula… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
129
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a recent development and a review on the topic, see Refs. [24,25]. Since all these considerations are modeldependent, we will focus in the following on the numerical determination of the bounce solution.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a recent development and a review on the topic, see Refs. [24,25]. Since all these considerations are modeldependent, we will focus in the following on the numerical determination of the bounce solution.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-exponential factor C is obtained from fluctuations around the classical bounce solution. It is notoriously difficult to compute [39,40], and is therefore usually estimated on dimensional grounds [41]. We use…”
Section: Jhep03(2014)106mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to broadly talk about first-order phase transitions of different strengths, we parameterize the potential V (φ) as in [27] using…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%