This is the second of two special issues, which emerged from a discussion that began at the EDI 2018 conference, where researchers explored the advances, setbacks, drifts and transformations brought about by strategies and actions to promote equity, diversity and inclusion. This issue focuses on the labor market integration of immigrants from a global and comparative perspective. This includes the institutional and social approaches aiming at achieving equity and inclusion goals at the social, labor market and organizational levels.Globally, immigrants are often disadvantaged in their host country's labor markets, being denied jobs that match their educational credentials, segregated into lower-paying and precarious jobs and being subjected to frequent discrimination (Vassilopoulou et al., 2022;Vassilopoulou and Brabet, 2019). Thus, from a comparative perspective that strives to analyze more closely the dynamics of the employment integration of immigrants, three paths can be taken to correct their underrepresentation and improve access to different job categories and working conditions within organizations. The first, and perhaps most influential, is by strengthening public policy on employment equity. The second is by involving various stakeholders, including unions, civil society and other bodies in the establishment and achievement of equity and diversity objectives. The third is by redefining the role of organizations in implementing more effective action plans aimed at better integrating disadvantaged workers into the labor market.
Stronger employment equity legislationEmployment statistics continue to highlight the persistence of structural inequalities and discrimination against disadvantaged groups, such as immigrants, in the labor market. These inequalities persist irregardless of whether a country experiences a challenging or prosperous economic condition. Studies show that employers, even when they are willing to voluntarily engage in strategies and action to strengthen employment equity, face difficulties in fully and advantageously utilizing migrant and underrepresented workers (Saba et al., 2021;Vassilopoulou, 2017). Three main reasons account for the underrepresentation of disadvantaged and migrant workers in organizations. The first is employers' lack of knowledge about the systemic and structural barriers in employment that inhabit their organizations. The second is organizations' lack of expertise in implementing effective and proven EDI programs to hire and retain diverse workers. The third relates to the backlash and resistance to any change that seeks to create more inclusive organizations and workplaces (Lam and Ng, 2020). Moreover, EDI action plans are often misunderstood, thought to set up a preferential system when, in fact, they establish redress mechanisms, systems to ensure equitable treatment and support to strengthen these systems (Saba et al., 2021).