2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2018)016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond triality: dual quiver gauge theories and little string theories

Abstract: The web of dual gauge theories engineered from a class of toric Calabi-Yau threefolds is explored. In previous work, we have argued for a triality structure by compiling evidence for the fact that every such manifold X N,M (for given (N, M )) engineers three a priori different, weakly coupled quiver gauge theories in five dimensions. The strong coupling regime of the latter is in general described by Little String Theories. Furthermore, we also conjectured that the manifold X N,M is dual to X N ,M if N M = N M… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(160 reference statements)
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series of works [1][2][3][4] it has been argued that a certain class of N = 1 supersymmetric little string theories (LSTs) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] of A-type [16,17] exhibits an intricate web of dualities. These theories are engineered in M-theory by N parallel M5-branes spread out on a circle S 1 and probing a transverse Z M geometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a series of works [1][2][3][4] it has been argued that a certain class of N = 1 supersymmetric little string theories (LSTs) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] of A-type [16,17] exhibits an intricate web of dualities. These theories are engineered in M-theory by N parallel M5-branes spread out on a circle S 1 and probing a transverse Z M geometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equality was shown explicitly in [2] for M = 1 and for general (N, M ) in [19] assuming a certain limit of two deformation parameters 1,2 that are required to render Z N,M (ω, 1,2 ) well defined. Combined with the triality of supersymmetric gauge theories argued in [3], this lead to the conjecture [4] of a vast web of dual gauge theories with gauge groups [U (N )] M with N M = N M and gcd(N, M ) = gcd(N , M ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this description is in general not unique: fiber-base duality of X N,M (or general string S-duality) suggests that the theory [U (N )] M is dual to [U (M )] N , which implies the existence of an equivalent expansion of Z N,M in terms of a different subset of ω that matches the instanton series of the latter theory. Moreover, as was recently been pointed out in a series of works [12][13][14], there exist numerous other theories dual to [U (N )] M , each of which entailing a new (but equivalent) expansion of Z N,M . More precisely, based on geometric considerations related to the extended moduli space of X N,M it was conjectured [27] that the theory [U (N )] M is dual to [U (N )] M if N M = N M and gcd(N , M ) = gcd(N, M ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This paper constitutes the second part in our study of symmetries in a class of supersymmetric quantum field theories, that are constructed from N parallel M5-branes spaced out on a circle and probing a transverse Z M orbifold background [2][3][4][5][6]. Continuing the work started in the companion paper [1] as well as [7], we focus on M = 1 and use recent insights into dualities among these configurations (which have been described in detail in [8][9][10][11]) to gain a better picture of the symmetries realised within a single such theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They thus correspond to a simplified version of string theory, in which notably gravity is decoupled. The study of such theories has attracted a lot of attention recently, with a focus on classifying them [14,15] and exploring their duality structures [9][10][11]. The study of the A-type LSTs has been particularly fruitful 1 due to the fact that if one considers them on R 4 × T 2 , the (refined) BPS partition function Z N,M (ω, 1,2 ) can be computed and analysed in a very explicit and direct fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%