2021
DOI: 10.2969/jmsj/79867986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BHK mirror symmetry for K3 surfaces with non-symplectic automorphism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in a weighted projective space, and supersymmetric quotients thereof. As was shown in [14], using recent mathematical results [27][28][29][30], the diagonal action of an order p purely nonsymplectic automorphim σ p acting on a surface of type (2.3) and of the corresponding order p automorphismσ p of the mirror surface (in the Greene-Plesser [31]/Berglund-Hübsch [32] sense) can be lifted to a mirrored automorphism σ p of non-linear sigma models on K3, corresponding to a certain element of the orthogonal group O(Γ 4,20 ). Importantly, the action of σ p leaves no sub-lattice of Γ 4,20 invariant, and its matrix representation M p can JHEP09(2020)082…”
Section: Brief Presentation Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…in a weighted projective space, and supersymmetric quotients thereof. As was shown in [14], using recent mathematical results [27][28][29][30], the diagonal action of an order p purely nonsymplectic automorphim σ p acting on a surface of type (2.3) and of the corresponding order p automorphismσ p of the mirror surface (in the Greene-Plesser [31]/Berglund-Hübsch [32] sense) can be lifted to a mirrored automorphism σ p of non-linear sigma models on K3, corresponding to a certain element of the orthogonal group O(Γ 4,20 ). Importantly, the action of σ p leaves no sub-lattice of Γ 4,20 invariant, and its matrix representation M p can JHEP09(2020)082…”
Section: Brief Presentation Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This result has been proved for n = 2 by Artebani, Boissière and Sarti in [1] and for n prime by Comparin, Lyons, Priddis and Suggs in [15], and for all other n, except for n = 4, 8, 12 in [16]. In all cases, the proof of the theorem is done computing the invariant lattices S(σ n ) and S(σ T n ) for the K3 surfaces X W,G and X W T ,G T and then comparing them, in order to show they are mirror lattices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Such relations are no longer avalaible when n is not prime, so that in [16] the authors introduce new methods for computing S(σ n ) in order to prove the theorem for n composite and different from 4, 8, 12. However, these methods we not sufficient for n = 4, 8, 12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in a weighted projective space, and supersymmetric quotients thereof. As was shown in [14], using recent mathematical results [24][25][26][27], the diagonal action of an order p purely non-symplectic automorphim σ p acting on a surface of type (2.3) and of the corresponding order p automorphism σp of the mirror surface (in the Greene-Plesser [28]/Berglund-Hübsch [29] sense) can be lifted to a mirrored automorphism σ p of non-linear sigma models on K3, corresponding to a certain element of the orthogonal group O(Γ 4,20 ). Importantly, the action of σ p leaves no sub-lattice of Γ 4,20 invariant, and its matrix representation M p can be diagonalized over C as 1…”
Section: Brief Presentation Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 81%