2006
DOI: 10.2495/ut060841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-level optimal toll design problem solved by the inverse Stackelberg games approach

Abstract: We consider the special type of Stackelberg games known as inverse (or reverse) Stackelberg games and their application to the problem of bi-level optimal toll design in road traffic systems. On a given strongly connected network we assume a noncooperative game with two levels of players: the road authority as a leader and travelers as followers. We consider the road authority with two possible objectives: It either tries to maximize the total toll revenue or to minimize the total travel time of the network by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally applications were found in economics, but nowadays Stackelberg problems are recognized to be present in many other areas; see e.g. [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Example 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally applications were found in economics, but nowadays Stackelberg problems are recognized to be present in many other areas; see e.g. [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Example 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many Stackelberg formulations, the upper level was for authority and the lower level for users, which meant that users would fully implement the optimal strategies set by the authority. In reality, traffic flow patterns may not follow this plan exactly, especially if traffic conditions change ( 34 , 35 ). Some exceptions existed in works published by Chiu and Mahmassani ( 36 , 37 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coordination problems with a mediator have also been examined in leader-follower games (Tharakunnel 2008) and Stackelberg games (Staňková et al 2006). In these studies, a leader makes a decision that affects followers' rewards such that followers are motivated to coordinate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%