2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-level optimization for the energy conversion efficiency improvement in a photocatalytic-hydrogen-production system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the variety of parameters and analytic approaches to each process stage, it may not be possible to simply optimize each stage separately such that the solar-to-product figure of merit is maximized. One possibility is to use supervised ML as a powerful tool for making a variety of predictions for catalyst and reactor properties, [84][85][86][87][88][89][90] where relevant features in catalyst and reactor design (i.e., electronegativity, band center, surface area, reaction conditions, and reactor geometry/topology) can serve as input features for training a model on desired outputs (i.e., product formation rate, selectivity, stability, and efficiency). [91][92][93] Within photocatalysis, ML has been successfully employed, for example, to predict perovskite materials (using features including from electronegativity, light intensity, photocatalyst quantity, and calcination temperature) [94] and layered double hydroxides (using elemental and structural features generated from external packages [95,96] and based on local chemical hardness) for water splitting, organic heterojunction photocatalysts (using electronic descriptors such as electron affinity and reorganization energy) for hydrogen production, [97] and optimal reaction conditions (flow rate and reactor temperature) for the degradation of dyes.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the variety of parameters and analytic approaches to each process stage, it may not be possible to simply optimize each stage separately such that the solar-to-product figure of merit is maximized. One possibility is to use supervised ML as a powerful tool for making a variety of predictions for catalyst and reactor properties, [84][85][86][87][88][89][90] where relevant features in catalyst and reactor design (i.e., electronegativity, band center, surface area, reaction conditions, and reactor geometry/topology) can serve as input features for training a model on desired outputs (i.e., product formation rate, selectivity, stability, and efficiency). [91][92][93] Within photocatalysis, ML has been successfully employed, for example, to predict perovskite materials (using features including from electronegativity, light intensity, photocatalyst quantity, and calcination temperature) [94] and layered double hydroxides (using elemental and structural features generated from external packages [95,96] and based on local chemical hardness) for water splitting, organic heterojunction photocatalysts (using electronic descriptors such as electron affinity and reorganization energy) for hydrogen production, [97] and optimal reaction conditions (flow rate and reactor temperature) for the degradation of dyes.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photocatalytic process is a multiphase reaction and flow process involving mass and energy balance. Numerical simulation of this process is challenging due to the diversity of reaction substances, light sources, flow conditions, and catalyst forms [19]. Kumar and Bansal simulated the photocatalytic process in an immobilized reactor using computational fluid dynamics for the first time [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 18 21.6 mm, and 24.4 mm with increasing incident radiation intensity. Combined with Equation(19), it is observed that when the photocatalyst concentration is constant, the exponential part on the right side of the radiation field control equation remains unchanged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%