2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-021-09598-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-objective design-for-control of water distribution networks with global bounds

Abstract: This manuscript investigates the design-for-control (DfC) problem of minimizing pressure induced leakage and maximizing resilience in existing water distribution networks. The problem consists in simultaneously selecting locations for the installation of new valves and/or pipes, and optimizing valve control settings. This results in a challenging optimization problem belonging to the class of non-convex bi-objective mixed-integer non-linear programs (BOMINLP). In this manuscript, we propose and investigate a m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the tightened variable bounds and the relaxed constraints are used along with the method of ε-constraints ( [38]), as well as the solutions obtained with the heuristic, for the calculation of a superset of the Pareto front of OFH. The use of the ε-constraints method for the calculation of supersets of Pareto fronts for biobjective MINLPs has been previously presented by Ulusoy et al [39]. In our case, this is achieved by formulating and solving the MIP,…”
Section: Global Optimality Boundsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Next, the tightened variable bounds and the relaxed constraints are used along with the method of ε-constraints ( [38]), as well as the solutions obtained with the heuristic, for the calculation of a superset of the Pareto front of OFH. The use of the ε-constraints method for the calculation of supersets of Pareto fronts for biobjective MINLPs has been previously presented by Ulusoy et al [39]. In our case, this is achieved by formulating and solving the MIP,…”
Section: Global Optimality Boundsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is partly due to the fact that MOIPs represent a flexible tool to model real-world applications. Such models appear in works on finance, management, transportation, design of water distribution networks, biology [15,20,21,22,23]. MOIPs are intrinsically nonconvex, implying that the design of exact and efficient solution methods is particularly challenging and requires global optimization techniques [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this study, the results of the proposed heuristic-based method have been compared with the results of the widely used NSGA II method. Having said this, other mathematical optimization methods could have been used for the comparison instead of the NSGA II, as these methods have also proven to be effective in dealing with the issues of nonlinearity and discrete nature of decision variables present in the control and operation of water supply systems (e.g., Pecci et al 2019Pecci et al , 2021Ulusoy et al 2021). However, this is beyond the scope of present work, and a robust comparison of different mathematical and other optimization methods with the heuristic-based method proposed here is recommended for future work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%