2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03919-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-objective dynamic weapon-target assignment problem with stability measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hosein used the maximum marginal return algorithm and suboptimal algorithm, and it is efcient to obtain the bounds of the optimal solution. Silav et al [17] developed biobjective model for dynamic WTA, and a linearization approach is applied to the objective function. And the result showed that the approach can be used for real-time constrained WTA problem and can assist decision-making in a relatively short time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hosein used the maximum marginal return algorithm and suboptimal algorithm, and it is efcient to obtain the bounds of the optimal solution. Silav et al [17] developed biobjective model for dynamic WTA, and a linearization approach is applied to the objective function. And the result showed that the approach can be used for real-time constrained WTA problem and can assist decision-making in a relatively short time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahner [10] considers the uncertainty of the second stage and assigned the available weapons by including the expected value of the sec-ond stage in the first stage target. Silav [11] considers that the incoming air targets are random, and defines the objective function as the maximization of the probability of no-leaker in the engagement sequence of the weapon system. Based on the above model, various algorithms have been proposed to solve the DWTA problem since the 1970s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%