2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-objective optimization of a multiple-target active debris removal mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, a cubist satellite with 15 mm relative displacement showed no change in behavior when its structural change was aimed toward optimization [19,20]. In other works, the response of peak-to-peak voltage in various thermal shocking conditions differed from shocking at constant temperature because of degradation [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, a cubist satellite with 15 mm relative displacement showed no change in behavior when its structural change was aimed toward optimization [19,20]. In other works, the response of peak-to-peak voltage in various thermal shocking conditions differed from shocking at constant temperature because of degradation [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbee et al (2012) proposed a series method that can find a goodwhile not necessarily optimalvisiting order for the ADR mission with relatively low computational load. Some researchers, including Cerf (2013;2015), Bérend and Olive (2016), introduced a drift orbit, which is an intermediate orbit that…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Berend and Olive. 8) preprocessed the dynamic problem with the discretization of the transfer duration. Indeed, a fine-grained discretization step is beneficial with regards to the quality of the solution, but highly detrimental to the computation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to remove as many as debris targets as possible in limited time, it may be necessary to correct the RAAN difference by actively using engine thrust actively in addition to the J2 effect. Despite the advancements in previous works [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] , most of the approximation methods proposed have focused on only one manner of RAAN correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%