Bi-Objective Optimization of Vessel Speed and Route for Sustainable Coastal Shipping under the Regulations of Emission Control Areas

Abstract

To comply with the regulations of emission control areas (ECAs), most operators have to switch to low-sulfur fuels inside the ECAs. Besides, a low-carbon objective is essential for long-term environmental protection; thus, is regarded as important as making profit. Therefore, the operators start making speed and route decisions under the two objectives of minimizing carbon emissions and maximizing profit. Drawing on existing methods, this paper formulates the profit and carbon emissions in sustainable coastal shipping, investigates the speed and route principles, and determines the best tradeoff between profit and carbon emissions. It is found that vessel speed should be set between emissions-optimum speed and profit-optimum speed, and the route must be selected in light of the speed decision. Next, the optimal choices of speed and route were examined under different scenarios and vessel types. The results show that the operation measures and objectives depend greatly on fuel price, vessel load, and vessel parameters. The operator should speed up the vessel if he/she wants to make more profit or if the scenario is favorable for profit making; e.g., low fuel price and high vessel load (LFHL). Large vessels should pursue more profit under LFHL conditions, without having to sail further outside the ECA. But this rule does not apply to small vessels. In addition, the operator should slow down the vessel inside the ECA and sail further, outside the ECA, with the growth in the price spread between marine gas oil (MGO) and heavy fuel oil (HFO), especially at a low HFO price. The research findings help operators to design operational measures that best suit the limit on sulfur content in fuel and the situation of the shipping market.

Towards the IMO’s GHG Goals: A Critical Overview of the Perspectives and Challenges of the Main Options for Decarbonizing International Shipping

“…It is now recognized that improving sustainability in maritime shipping requires a multi-disciplinary approach [18], and makes it desirable the adoption of multi-objective optimization. The potential of multi-objective optimization to facilitate informed decision making by shipping operators has been investigated in References [95,104] indicating its viability to the modeling and optimization of operational and strategic decisions in sustainable shipping.…”

A Set Covering Model for a Green Ship Routing and Scheduling Problem with Berth Time-Window Constraints for Use in the Bulk Cargo Industry

“…The proposed method could offer various alternatives to control tower (decision-makers) using the Pareto frontier to make decisions and provide an appropriate transportation plan. Decision-makers can choose one of the Pareto solutions as routes and schedules for each barge based on the Pareto frontier to balance the two conflicting objectives at the same time [46]. The comparison of different bi-objective optimization methods shows that the proposed method can generate a variety of different Pareto solutions than the weighted sum method and the proposed method represents a larger value of the hypervolume indicator than the weighted sum method for all instances: 11.82%, 45.14%, and 35.97%, respectively.…”

Capesize time charter equivalent optimization based on speed and environmental regulations

“…They used speed reduction assumptions of 10%, 20 and 30% compared to business-as-usual scenarios and found that the combination of accelerating the newbuild technical efficiency standards by 5 years and reducing speeds by 30% can lead to the highest probabilities of meeting the IMO's targets for 2050. Zhao et al (2019) examined optimization decisions for speed and route selection in the context of maximizing profits and minimizing carbon emissions for coastal shipping. They found a trade-off between the emissions optimal speed and profit optimal speeds.…”