2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-objective resource-constrained project scheduling with robustness and makespan criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 presents the results from the paper by Abbasi et al [10]. They used LRS to calculate the time of activities.…”
Section: Population Size=50mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 4 presents the results from the paper by Abbasi et al [10]. They used LRS to calculate the time of activities.…”
Section: Population Size=50mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (8) show that project starts at zero time and constraint (9) calculates the latest start time of each activity. Constraint (10) calculates the earliest time of each activity. Constraint (11) before Eq.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed approach worked based on using genetic operators with fuzzy logic controller (FLC) through initializing the revised serial method with precedence and resources constraints. Afterward, an attempt has been accomplished for minimizing , as well as maximizing solution robustness by increasing float time maximization (Abbasi et al, 2006). In another study, a two-stage algorithm was developed for RCPSP while minimize , considered as an acceptance threshold for the second stage and then, in next stage, a set of 12 alternative robust predictive indicators was employed to maximize robustness of the project (Chtourou & Haouari, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%