2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.07.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-Sobolev solutions to the prescribed Jacobian inequality in the plane with L data and applications to nonlinear elasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the Jacobian plays an important role in Continuum Mechanics, specially in nonlinear elasticity, see e.g. [5,16,20,27]. This is not surprising since, for a Sobolev map, positivity of the Jacobian implies a weak form of local invertibility [21].…”
Section: Linearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the Jacobian plays an important role in Continuum Mechanics, specially in nonlinear elasticity, see e.g. [5,16,20,27]. This is not surprising since, for a Sobolev map, positivity of the Jacobian implies a weak form of local invertibility [21].…”
Section: Linearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f is such that W (x, f (x)) ≡ min Although there is a good existence theory for (1.2) whenever there is some α > 0 such that u 0 is a C 1,α -diffeomorphism and f ∈ C 0,α [19,21,52,58], little is known when f is just an L p function. We refer the reader to [29,38,47,50,55], as well as our our recent works [34,35] for results in this direction; counter-examples in the p = ∞ case were obtained in [13,51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The, strongly underdertemined, problem consists in finding a vector field satisfying instead of (together with appropriate Dirichlet boundary conditions). Theoretical results of the prescribed Jacobian inequality are given, e.g., in [ 34 ], and to the best of our knowledge there are no proposed numerical methods to solve this type of inequality. It will be addressed by, e.g., including interior-point methods [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%