2014
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2014.130318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias analysis of maximum likelihood target location estimator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To complement the investigation, we shall examine the bias of the object location estimate for the three elliptic localization approaches, when the MLE is used. We shall apply the bias formula of the MLE for a generic localization problem derived in [48] to elliptic positioning.…”
Section: B Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To complement the investigation, we shall examine the bias of the object location estimate for the three elliptic localization approaches, when the MLE is used. We shall apply the bias formula of the MLE for a generic localization problem derived in [48] to elliptic positioning.…”
Section: B Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putting (45) to (44) gives (47) Upon using (36) and followed by (37), (47) can further be reduced to (48) The right side of (48) attains the minimum value at . The minimum possible error is .…”
Section: B 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that in contrast with the closed-form estimator, the MLE provided asymptotic unbiased estimates. Rui and Ho [15], [22] derived the bias by performing Taylor-series expansion of the maximum likelihood (ML) cost function up to second order. This method can achieve a good result at small or moderate noise level with good geolocation geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most studied localisation methods is based on the Gauss–Newton algorithm using the Taylor‐series expansion [1]. The bias of the location estimate stemming from the Gaussian measurement noise and sensor position errors has been analysed in [2]. The total least squares method has been used to eliminate the bias in the conventional location estimator [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%