2005
DOI: 10.14358/pers.71.8.909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias-compensated RPCs for Sensor Orientation of High-resolution Satellite Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
129
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
129
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…GeoEye does not provide per-pixel look angles, instead a sensor orientation model, or rational function model (RFM) is used to describe the object-to-image space transformation mathematically. RFM parameters derived from a rigorous sensor model are supplied with the imagery and are termed RPCs [36,37].…”
Section: Ikonos Stereo Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GeoEye does not provide per-pixel look angles, instead a sensor orientation model, or rational function model (RFM) is used to describe the object-to-image space transformation mathematically. RFM parameters derived from a rigorous sensor model are supplied with the imagery and are termed RPCs [36,37].…”
Section: Ikonos Stereo Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for most satellite stereo imagery, the orientation procedure is essential, and it is almost equal to the refinement of the RPCs. The additional biascompensation bundle block adjustment is a convenient and accurate method to refine the RPCs and remove the bias (Grodecki and Dial, 2003;Fraser and Hanley, 2005). As we know, the limitation of this method is the requirement of GCPs.…”
Section: Global Relative Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bias-compensated bundle block adjustment is an absolute orientation procedure and, practically, the minimum number of GCPs should be 4 to 6 (Fraser and Hanley, 2005).…”
Section: Relative Bias-compensated Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This error arises due to the errors in the satellite attitude and Ephemeris determination as well as due to the limited accuracy of sensor orientation described by the RPC models as compared to the rigorous sensor model (Fraser and Hanley, 2005;Grodecki and Dial, 2003). In this work, only the relative RPC error (De Franchis et al, 2014) is removed so that the corresponding points between the two images lie on the corresponding epipolar lines.…”
Section: Relative Rpc Errormentioning
confidence: 99%