2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias-corrected realized variance under dependent microstructure noise

Abstract: The aim of this study is to develop a bias-correction method for realized variance (RV) estimation, where the equilibrium price process is contaminated with market microstructure noise, such as bid-ask bounces and price changes discreteness. Though RV constitutes the simplest estimator of daily integrated variance, it remains strongly biased and many estimators proposed in previous studies require prior knowledge about the dependence structure of microstructure noise to ensure unbiasedness and consistency. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, realized volatility is influenced by market microstructure noise induced by various market frictions, such as bid-ask spread and non-synchronous trading (Campbell et al, 1997). There are some methods available for mitigating the effect of microstructure noise on realized volatility (Zhou, 1996;Barndorff-Nielsen et al, 2004bAït-Sahalia et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005;Bandi and Russell, 2006Hansen and Lunde, 2006;Zhang, 2006;Kunitomo and Sato, 2008;Jacod et al, 2009;Oya, 2011). It is worthwhile applying these methods and comparing the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, realized volatility is influenced by market microstructure noise induced by various market frictions, such as bid-ask spread and non-synchronous trading (Campbell et al, 1997). There are some methods available for mitigating the effect of microstructure noise on realized volatility (Zhou, 1996;Barndorff-Nielsen et al, 2004bAït-Sahalia et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005;Bandi and Russell, 2006Hansen and Lunde, 2006;Zhang, 2006;Kunitomo and Sato, 2008;Jacod et al, 2009;Oya, 2011). It is worthwhile applying these methods and comparing the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%