2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias in older adults’ driving self-assessments: The role of personality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, in transportation studies, there is considerable literature about personality traits and their relationship with driving style and risk-taking behaviors [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Almost all of these studies conclude that assessing personality traits is useful for predicting driving behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in transportation studies, there is considerable literature about personality traits and their relationship with driving style and risk-taking behaviors [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Almost all of these studies conclude that assessing personality traits is useful for predicting driving behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in line with SET [ 13 ], older adults may need to exert even more effort to reduce or eliminate the age differences in performance. There is literature suggesting that older adults who are high in extraversion are more actively engaged both cognitive and physically with their environments than older adults low in extraversion [ 30 , 31 ] and rate themselves higher on self-efficacy [ 32 ]. If high extraversion older adults are highly engaged in and believe they have the capacity to succeed on difficult cognitive tasks like the n -back, then they may put forth more effort which would be commensurate with the higher levels of HR activation seen during the n -back compared to the BDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of awareness, defined by Marotolli and Richardson (1998), is the “discrepancy between one’s perception of ability and actual ability,” (p. 332) and is critical for identifying, and adapting to, driving limitations. The drawbacks of self-evaluations are well known, often including inaccuracy of responses due to recall bias (difficulty remembering) or overestimation of one’s driving abilities (Blanchard, Myers, & Porter, 2010; McPeek, Nichols, Classen, & Breiner, 2011). Older drivers may not answer honestly because of the potential to receive unwanted results (Eby, Molnar, Shope, Vivoda, & Fordyce, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%