2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias with respect to socioeconomic status: A closer look at zip code matching in a pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness study

Abstract: In 2010, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was introduced in the US for prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in children. Individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) is a potential confounder of the estimated effectiveness of PCV13 and is often controlled for in observational studies using zip code as a proxy. We assessed the utility of zip code matching for control of SES in a post-licensure evaluation of the effectiveness of PCV13 (calculated as [1-matched odds ratio]*100). We used a di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the gradient of risk associated with ICE measures in the present study compared to previous studies are likely due to measuring [34,38,53]. We focused on zip codes as they represent larger local geographic units providing more robust estimates of racial and economic disparity [43,49,50]. Findings from the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project suggest that zip codes provide instable socioeconomic estimates, in comparison to census tracts and blocks, and recommend using census tract as the unit of analysis for monitoring public data [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in the gradient of risk associated with ICE measures in the present study compared to previous studies are likely due to measuring [34,38,53]. We focused on zip codes as they represent larger local geographic units providing more robust estimates of racial and economic disparity [43,49,50]. Findings from the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project suggest that zip codes provide instable socioeconomic estimates, in comparison to census tracts and blocks, and recommend using census tract as the unit of analysis for monitoring public data [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are currently no studies that have assessed the utility of ICE measures in understanding poor health outcomes at the zip code level. Despite critiques about zip code level data [42,43], zip codes are a commonly used geographic unit to examine the relationship between neighborhood exposures and poor health outcomes [44][45][46][47][48], In comparison to census tracts, zip codes are slightly larger geographic units and can provide more stable estimates of neighborhood measures of racial and economic disparities [49,50]. Additionally, patterns of inequality may differ across geographic units warranting investigation to assess if social determinants should also be monitored at the zip code level [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of using zip code-based median incomes is a robust, well-established, widely used metric to determine the income levels for medical studies. 15 16 17 18 This technique uses a large population, readily available data and zip codes and does not require notable economic investment that other techniques, such as tract-based measures, require. 15 , 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed information on eligible and enrolled controls has been previously published. 23 Vaccine providers for cases and controls were contacted and state or city immunisation registries were reviewed to obtain vaccine and medical histories. Additional details on enrolment procedures have been previously published and are summarised in the online supplementary material for the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis, therefore, focuses on representativeness of enrolled cases with respect to eligible cases and leaves questions concerning controls for other analyses. 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%