2019
DOI: 10.1177/0963721419861415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biased Attention to Threat: Answering Old Questions With Young Infants

Abstract: For decades, researchers have been interested in humans’ ability to quickly detect threat-relevant stimuli. Here, we review recent findings from infant research on biased attention to threat and discuss how these data speak to classic assumptions about whether attention biases for threat are normative, whether they change with development, and what factors might contribute to this developmental change. We conclude that although there is some stability in attention biases in infancy, various factors—including t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Threat-biased attention develops from early childhood ( Bayet and Nelson, 2019 ), and maladaptive development of this attentional mechanism conveys risks for later socioemotional problems ( LoBue and Pérez-Edgar, 2014 , Pérez-Edgar et al, 2011 , Pérez-Edgar et al, 2010 ). A well-documented behavioral change in threat-biased attention occurs in early childhood, such that from infancy to childhood there is shift from a specific bias towards fear (e.g., preferential looking to fearful faces) to a more generalized attentional bias toward threatening signals or negative emotions (e.g., anger and fear) by three years of age ( Burris et al, 2019 , Leppänen et al, 2007 ). However, little is known about the neural substrates of these behavioral changes, which in turn hinders our understanding of the brain-behavioral relationship in the development of threat-biased attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threat-biased attention develops from early childhood ( Bayet and Nelson, 2019 ), and maladaptive development of this attentional mechanism conveys risks for later socioemotional problems ( LoBue and Pérez-Edgar, 2014 , Pérez-Edgar et al, 2011 , Pérez-Edgar et al, 2010 ). A well-documented behavioral change in threat-biased attention occurs in early childhood, such that from infancy to childhood there is shift from a specific bias towards fear (e.g., preferential looking to fearful faces) to a more generalized attentional bias toward threatening signals or negative emotions (e.g., anger and fear) by three years of age ( Burris et al, 2019 , Leppänen et al, 2007 ). However, little is known about the neural substrates of these behavioral changes, which in turn hinders our understanding of the brain-behavioral relationship in the development of threat-biased attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the acquisition model suggests that specific developmental experiences will cause normative attentional biases to increase over time. Our research team is currently collecting data to test these proposed models (Burris et al, 2019;in press).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, less engagement, or slower looking, and difficulty disengaging from emotional stimuli—characteristic of infants of anxious mothers—associate with the development of anxiety in infants and children. Thus, emotional input from depressed or anxious caregivers could provide a foundation for the development of these same emotional problems in the infants themselves (see Burris et al, 2019 for a review). Further, physically maltreated boys who have a bias for angry faces are more aggressive than their same-aged peers, suggesting that a bias for anger in emotional facial configurations might translate into more externalizing behaviors over time, at least in boys (Shackman & Pollak, 2014).…”
Section: How Input Shapes Children's Emotion Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%