Biased labels: An experimental study of language and stigma among individuals in recovery and health professionals

Abstract

Background: Labels such as "addict" and "substance abuser" have been found to elicit implicit and explicit stigma among the general public previously. The difference in the levels of this bias among individuals in recovery and those employed in the health profession has not yet been identified, however. The current study seeks to answer this question using measures of implicit bias. Methods: A subset sample (n = 299) from a previously completed study (n = 1,288) was selected for analysis. Mixed-model ANOVA tests were completed to identify variance between d-prime automatic association scores with the terms "addict" and "substance abuser" among individuals in recovery and those identified as working in the health professions. Results: Individuals in recovery did not have lower negative associations with either term, whereas individuals employed as health professionals had greater negative associations with the term "substance abuser" but did not have greater negative associations with the term "addict". Conclusions: Results provide further evidence that previously identified stigmatizing labels have the potential to influence medical care and medical practitioner perceptions of individuals with substance use disorders and should be avoided. Further exploration into the role negative associations derived from commonly used labels have in the individual recovery process are needed to draw appropriate recommendations.

“Another tool for the tool box? I'll take it!”: Feasibility and acceptability of mobile recovery outreach teams (MROT) for opioid overdose patients in the emergency room

“…Recent research found that terms like "substance abusers" and "opioid addict" were associated with negative explicit bias (Ashford, Brown, & Curtis, 2018). Building upon those findings, the authors went on to find that stigmatizing terms have the potential to influence medical personnel and their perceptions of individuals with substance use disorders (Ashford, Brown, McDaniel, & Curtis, 2019). Subtle changes to language that reduce stigma might be especially impactful in this setting, as ER staff may be the first health professionals an overdose patient encounters.…”

Opioid Agonist Therapy During Hospitalization Within the Veterans Health Administration: a Pragmatic Retrospective Cohort Analysis

“…To address this issue, the VHA and other national hospital authorities could publish specific guidance promoting evidence-based addictions hospital care 40 or create educational campaigns encouraging hospital-based OAT delivery. These initiatives would likely need to address provider knowledge gaps and addiction-related stigma, 20,41 describe pathways to OAT after discharge, and identify policies impeding care inside and outside the hospital-setting. 20 Future Research.…”

A US national randomized study to guide how best to reduce stigma when describing drug‐related impairment in practice and policy

“…In fact, rigorous scientific investigations have now shown that certain common terms in the field used to describe individuals suffering from chronic drug-related impairment (e.g. 'substance abuser') may actually induce explicit and implicit cognitive biases that result in a perceived need for punishment rather than treatment [15][16][17]. Such research has made it difficult to trivialize and dismiss the terminology debate as merely 'semantics' or a linguistic preference for 'political correctness'.…”