2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12998-018-0189-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biased online media coverage: chiropractic and stroke in google news

Abstract: BackgroundChiropractic has professional tensions with other medical disciplines. This sets up a biased online media coverage of controversial issues, such as the unverified causal relation between chiropractic treatment and stroke. The objective of this study is to find and analyze recent online media texts relevant to the alleged causal relation between chiropractic treatment and stroke, using Google News search, including such characteristics of texts as tone and position on Google News Search Engine Results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the initial positive experience of appointing social media editors to promote journal articles,8990 related social communication activities are still not thoroughly controlled by journal editors and publishers. In such a scenario, biased and misleading comments may find their way to the online platforms, leading to unintentional and intentional damages to scholarly outputs 919293. Skewed opinion polls and geographically disproportionate online activities can also negatively affect post-publication communication, particularly because of the active use of Twitter and other powerful social platforms by scholars in developed countries and passive stance of those in developing countries 9495…”
Section: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the initial positive experience of appointing social media editors to promote journal articles,8990 related social communication activities are still not thoroughly controlled by journal editors and publishers. In such a scenario, biased and misleading comments may find their way to the online platforms, leading to unintentional and intentional damages to scholarly outputs 919293. Skewed opinion polls and geographically disproportionate online activities can also negatively affect post-publication communication, particularly because of the active use of Twitter and other powerful social platforms by scholars in developed countries and passive stance of those in developing countries 9495…”
Section: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%