2017
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2017.2667518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biased PNG With Terminal-Angle Constraint for Intercepting Nonmaneuvering Targets Under Physical Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(e), are both forced to eventually approaches zero, thereby guaranteeing a precise attack and maximizing the warhead effect. Noting that the intended target is stationary in this case, the missile flight path angle is equal to the LOS angle at impact time according to the following equation [23] λ…”
Section: A Constant Velocity Missile Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(e), are both forced to eventually approaches zero, thereby guaranteeing a precise attack and maximizing the warhead effect. Noting that the intended target is stationary in this case, the missile flight path angle is equal to the LOS angle at impact time according to the following equation [23] λ…”
Section: A Constant Velocity Missile Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Ratnoo discussed the choice of navigation gains in [21] to achieve all possible impact angles without violating the FOV constraint. As for the biased PN guidance law, its pioneering examples were those of Park et al, wherein a bias-shaping addition were added to the classical PN guidance command to intercept stationary [22] and moving [23] targets at a desired impact angle under the FOV constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a and c should be in same sign and satisfy ac ≥ b 1 b 2 . These parameters in (29) are only determined by some boundary conditions and constraints, such as σ M 0 , σ M lim , and…”
Section: Implementation Of the Two-phased Guidance Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 3. If satisfied, calculate the range of parameter k by (29). If not, change the given launch conditions.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Two-phased Guidance Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation