2001
DOI: 10.1177/103841110103900306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biasing effects of physical disability, race, and job skill level on assessment of applicants

Abstract: We are deeply indebted to the two anonymous reviewers and the Editor for their painstaking efforts and the extremely meticulous comments given to us during the entire review process of this paper. A thousand thanks to all three of you.The study reported here employed a 2 (wheelchair-bound versus non-wheelchairbound) x 2 (Caucasian versus Chinese) x 2 (programmer versus computer operator) full factorial experiment design to examine the effects of evaluator biases on the perceived employability of job applicants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extant literature (e.g., Bagshaw 2006;Disability Homepage 2007;Neufeldt & Albright 1998;Perry 2002) indicates that the unemployment rate of PWDs is at least twice that of non-disabled people. For instance, the unemployment rate of PWDs in Singapore is reported to be as high as 53.3 percent (Lim & Ng 2001). In some other countries (e.g., Latin America, Caribbean, and Argentina), unemployment among PWDs is as high as 80 percent (United Nations 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature (e.g., Bagshaw 2006;Disability Homepage 2007;Neufeldt & Albright 1998;Perry 2002) indicates that the unemployment rate of PWDs is at least twice that of non-disabled people. For instance, the unemployment rate of PWDs in Singapore is reported to be as high as 53.3 percent (Lim & Ng 2001). In some other countries (e.g., Latin America, Caribbean, and Argentina), unemployment among PWDs is as high as 80 percent (United Nations 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%