2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00103-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biaxial load effects on crack extension in anisotropic solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lim and Choi et al [10] studied the theory of the biaxial load effects on crack extension in anisotropic solids, using the maximum circumferential tensile stress criterion. Shimamoto et al [11] obtained the stress intensity factors according to various biaxial load ratios in the cruciform specimens of elastic and anisotropic material by the photoelastic and caustic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lim and Choi et al [10] studied the theory of the biaxial load effects on crack extension in anisotropic solids, using the maximum circumferential tensile stress criterion. Shimamoto et al [11] obtained the stress intensity factors according to various biaxial load ratios in the cruciform specimens of elastic and anisotropic material by the photoelastic and caustic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure is much more simple: after employing homogenisation, one can simply apply Algorithm 1. However, since the homogenised material is orthotropic, the maximum circumferential tensile stress criterion would need to be reformulated, see for example [19,23]. Moreover, using the homogenised model implies losing the effects of locality, as well as the influence of the internal boundaries on the path, unless the latter aspect is incorporated somehow.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other analytical investigations on fracture behavior of composites can be found in [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. As the analytical methods are not feasible in resolving practical engineering problems, numerical methods are better alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%