2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1011/1/012074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biaxial strain effects on the electronic properties of silicene: the density-functional-theory-based calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lattice constant of germanene is higher than that of silicene (3.86 Å) [32]. As for the bond lengths, the calculated Ge-Ge bond (d) is 2.46 Å, which is slightly higher than that of the Si-Si bond in silicene (2.24 Å) [33]. This result is in agreement with the results of previous theoretical [25,34] and experimental studies [7].…”
Section: Germanene In An Aqueous Environmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The lattice constant of germanene is higher than that of silicene (3.86 Å) [32]. As for the bond lengths, the calculated Ge-Ge bond (d) is 2.46 Å, which is slightly higher than that of the Si-Si bond in silicene (2.24 Å) [33]. This result is in agreement with the results of previous theoretical [25,34] and experimental studies [7].…”
Section: Germanene In An Aqueous Environmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The level of biaxial strain that induces this transition varies among different studies, ranging from 6% 47 to 8%. 48 Au(111) could represent a perfect platform for the investigation of such effect, as the strain level of the detected silicene phase is very close to those values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The results of the calculations show that despite the huge mechanical deformation, the Dirac cone is preserved. 47 , 48 For high biaxial strain levels, the tip of the Dirac cone shifts above the Fermi energy, inducing the formation of hole-doped Dirac states. The level of biaxial strain that induces this transition varies among different studies, ranging from 6% 47 to 8%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters used in the DFT calculations are also used for both SCF and phonon calculations. We calculate the cohesive energies for both square (SQ) and honeycomb (HC) structures as follows [35]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%