1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00739999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliography on quantum logics and related structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1,094 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not mean that interest in applying non-classical logics to the foundations of quantum mechanics vanished completely. On the contrary, in the seventies and eighties more than thousand papers were published as well as nearly twenty books, and several international conferences on 'quantum logics and related structures' were held (see the extensive Pavičić bibliography [17] published in 1992 that contains more than 1500 entries). Although no systematic bibliographical research was performed later, it seems that later on these numbers could have even doubled.…”
Section: Many-valued Logics In Foundations Of Quantum Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not mean that interest in applying non-classical logics to the foundations of quantum mechanics vanished completely. On the contrary, in the seventies and eighties more than thousand papers were published as well as nearly twenty books, and several international conferences on 'quantum logics and related structures' were held (see the extensive Pavičić bibliography [17] published in 1992 that contains more than 1500 entries). Although no systematic bibliographical research was performed later, it seems that later on these numbers could have even doubled.…”
Section: Many-valued Logics In Foundations Of Quantum Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we could see above, the implications do not play any decisive role in the definition of lattices, especially not in the definitions of OML and DL where they do not appear at all, and they also do not play a decisive role in the definition of logics. A few decades ago that was a major issue, though: "A 'logic' without an implication ... is radically incomplete, and hardly qualifies as a theory of deduction" [42] and a hunt to find a "proper implication" among the five possible ones was pursued in 1970ies and 1980ies [43][44][45]. Apart from → 1 and → 3 it turns out [25] that one can also define a →…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum logic was born in the seminal 1936 paper co-authored by Garret Birkhoff and John von Neumann (1936), and after about a 25-year-long dormancy, it has developed into a rich field in the past 40 years, with literally thousands of papers dealing with different aspects of it (see the bibliography of Pavicic 1992). The revival of quantum logic in the early sixties was a peculiar one however: the notion of quantum logic that came to be accepted as the standard concept differed substantially from the original idea put forward by Birkhoff and von Neumann, but the discrepancy between the standard view and the original concept was not the subject of a systematic discussion at the time quantum logic became fashionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%