2016
DOI: 10.1080/0194262x.2016.1171191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliometric Analysis and Comparison of Two STEM LIS Journals:Science & Technology LibrariesandIssues in Science & Technology Librarianship(2005–2014)

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to present a bibliometric analysis and a comparison of two journals that cover all aspects of STEM librarianship: ISTL (Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship) and STL (Science & Technology Libraries). A recent 10 years of publications were selected to report many variables that describe and compare the bibliometric indicators of the publications and bibliographies. Each issue of these journals published from 2005 to 2014 were carefully examined, and nonresearch articles su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slutsky and Aytac (2016) selected two journals – Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship and Science & Technology Libraries – to analyse and compare the articles published in both from 2005–2014. The main goal of the study was to report the findings to LIS professional colleagues in order to enable them to compare the journals as potential future publication venues.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slutsky and Aytac (2016) selected two journals – Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship and Science & Technology Libraries – to analyse and compare the articles published in both from 2005–2014. The main goal of the study was to report the findings to LIS professional colleagues in order to enable them to compare the journals as potential future publication venues.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many bibliometric studies were published to analyze the different disciplines that represent the data of citation from different authors, institutes and countries. Similarly, for comparison of two LIS journals, Slutsky and Aytac (2016) conducted a study that showed the current publication trends in STEM. This will be helpful for new researchers to explore the research areas of the two journals.…”
Section: Reviewed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above trends indicate that various DL projects were developed around the world to promote equal knowledge access and to support literacy. Within literature, a few studies (Ahmad et al , 2018; Slutsky and Aytac, 2016) have conducted meta-analysis research on library information sciences to determine the status of DL development; and found that there are increasing trends of research published in DL domains. Ahmad et al (2018) asserted that 2015 and 2016 were the most productive years.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%