Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry from 1970 to 2019

Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser; Al-Sanabani, Fuad A.; Al-Kheraif, Abdulaziz A.; Smran, Ahlam; Alqerban, Ali; Samran, Abdulaziz

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.013

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The image differs slightly when it comes to citations. The total citations of JPR for 2010-2019 were 4716, a figure that is almost equal to one-third of that of JPD for the same period (n=14104 citations) [12]. In contrast, the h-index scores for JPR and JPD were not substantially different at 38 and 47, respectively.…”

mentioning

confidence: 82%

“…A bibliometric study provides tools to assess scientific production. Several bibliometric studies have been published in the field of dentistry [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], including prosthodontics [12][13][14][15], although most focused on the most cited articles. No bibliometric analysis of the research output of JPR has been conducted to date.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data on articles published by JPR from its inception (2009) through May 2021 were searched through the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection [12] and Scopus databases, extracted, and analyzed [16]. The data were exported as text files (tab-delimited file format) with the option "Full Record and Cited References."…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The records published by JPR in 2009-2019 (n=496) are equal to approximately one-fourth of those published by the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (JPD; n=1996) [12], the oldest prosthodontic journal (dated 1951), which is published monthly and represents the official journal for 24 leading US and international prosthodontic organizations. However, this was a source of pride.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of the <i>Journal of Prosthodontic Research</i> from 2009 to 2021

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

on a quarterly basis, and the first issue was published in January 2009. Demonstrating the trends and impact of a journal in its field is essential [1]. One approach to this is the "bibliometric analysis," through which the core research areas, authors, countries, journals, and their relationships can be identified by covering of all the publications related to a given topic, field, or journal [2,3]. In a bibliometric analysis, a citation analysis shows how frequently other authors cite a publication [4]. A bibliometric study provides tools to assess scientific production. Several bibliometric studies have been published in the field of dentistry [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], including prosthodontics [12][13][14][15], although most focused on the most cited articles. No bibliometric analysis of the research output of JPR has been conducted to date. Therefore, the present bibliometric study aimed to dissect the published documents, research areas, citation index, contributing authors, countries, and organizations as well as the references and sources cited by JPR since its inception.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 82%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of the <i>Journal of Prosthodontic Research</i> from 2009 to 2021

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several bibliometric studies in the field of dentistry have been published in recent decades (Ahmad et al, 2020 ; Yeung & Ho, 2019 ), some of which are related to oral implantology (Fardiet al, 2017 ; Lorusso et al, 2020 ; Tarazona et al, 2017b ), studying certain indicators, such as funding (Alonso-Arroyo et al, 2019 ), level of evidence (Wu et al, 2020 ), or geographic scope (Tarazona et al, 2017a ). However, bibliometric studies focused on the evolution and trends of the articles published in a single determined journal are scarce (Ahmadet al, 2019 ; Estrela et al, 2020 ; Alhajj et al, 2021 ) and none of the reviewed literature refers to implant-related journals.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific production of an oral implantology journal: a 5-year bibliometric study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral implantology is a science in constant evolution, with a considerable number of articles being published every year in scientific journals. Publications can be analyzed through bibliometric analysis, thus observing the evolution and trends of the articles published in the journal. To evaluate, through bibliometric analysis, the scientific production of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (CIDRR) and its evolution and trends in the last 5 years (2016–2020).All articles published in CIDRR in the last 5 years were reviewed and classified according to the year of publication, volume, number, the number of authors, demographic data of the first and last author, the geographical scope of the article, the number of affiliations of the authors, research topic, type of study, and study design. The association between these variables and citation counts was also analyzed. 599 articles were analyzed. 77.4% were authored by 4–6 authors, obtaining 78.4% from 1 to 3 different affiliations. Male researchers predominated in both the first and last authorship. China showed the highest number of publications when comparing the origin of the authors’ affiliations individually; however, most researchers (40.9%) were from the European Union (EU)-Western Europe area. The most studied topic was the implant/abutment design/treatment of the surface (19.1%). Clinical research articles accounted for 92.99% of the publications, of which cross-sectional observational studies prevailed (21.7%). The presence of articles from the United States of America-Canada and EU-Western Europe was positively correlated with the impact factor. This study revealed an increasing trend in Asian research production, particularly Chinese, whereas production of European origin showed a decrease. Clinical studies increased their relative weight to the detriment of translational ones. A growing tendency in the relative weights of female authors was appreciated. Journal citations were associated with certain study variables.

show abstract

Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most‐Cited Articles on the Methods of Shade‐Matching in Dentistry

Rashid,

Dudley

2024

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe purpose of this bibliometric analysis is to identify the 100 most cited articles and delve into citation metrics to gain insights into the evolving trends in shade‐matching methods in dentistry.Material and MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, two reviewers conducted a structured search in Scopus using keyword‐based search strings. The top 100 articles were selected based on predefined criteria, and their bibliometric data were extracted. Harzing's Publish Or Perish and VOSviewer were used to generate the bibliographic network.ResultsBetween 1989 and 2017, the top 100 articles were published and obtained citations ranging from 560 to 48. Twenty‐eight articles received over 100 citations, deemed classic. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry and the United States of America were the primary contributors. In‐vitro experimental studies employing restorative material samples were prevalent, with spectrophotometers being the favored method of color analysis. Using Python, Spearman's correlation coefficient resealed positive correlations between citation count and age of publication (r = 0.16, p = 0.12) and between citation count and the impact factor of the journal (r = 0.35, p < 0.05). However, a negative correlation was observed between citation density and age of publication (r = −0.46, p < 0.05).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated a significant upward trajectory of citation count in shade‐matching in dentistry, reflecting high‐quality scientific contributions.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry from 1970 to 2019

Cited by 19 publications

References 27 publications

Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of the <i>Journal of Prosthodontic Research</i> from 2009 to 2021

Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of the <i>Journal of Prosthodontic Research</i> from 2009 to 2021

Scientific production of an oral implantology journal: a 5-year bibliometric study

Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most‐Cited Articles on the Methods of Shade‐Matching in Dentistry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About