Bibliometric analysis of international researches on innovation metrics

Ferasso, Marcos; Cherobim, Ana Paula Mussi Szabo

doi:10.1504/ijbbm.2017.082420

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conceptual or theoretical papers are widely produced in the Business Management, and could be classified as literature reviews , systematic literature reviews, meta-synthesis (Ferasso et al, 2018), synthesis of researches , to name a few. There are also theoretical researches based on statistics applied to literature, such as meta-analysis, bibliometrics (Ferasso and Cherobim, 2017), scientometrics and network analysis of author/coauthor and bibliographic coupling for citations analyses (Ferasso et al, 2020).…”

Section: The Literature Review Sectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crafting scientific papers in business management: a canvas roadmap proposal

Ferasso

2021

MRJIAM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to present a tool for helping the mindset organization of graduate students and early career researchers in the process of scientific papers writing. The canvas roadmap is proposed and summarizes the fundamental steps and main features of an academic paper in the business management field. Design/methodology/approach The adopted methodological procedures followed action research and focus groups precepts. Validation was applied in longitudinal and transversal procedures, with two early career researchers and with three groups of graduate students from different institutions. The validation procedures allowed the identification of 15 main features that were structured in a canvas format. Findings The conception of the canvas roadmap, influenced by the business model canvas, is a tool for easing researchers’ mindset when preparing a manuscript. Each of 15 features are explored according to main identified components along the paper writing process. Advices for early researchers are addressed, and key characteristics are presented. Further readings in academic writing literature are suggested as along with practical tips for developing the manuscript. Research limitations/implications Specifically, the canvas roadmap proposal intends to guide Iberoamerican/Latin American scholars to achieve their goals of publishing in top tier journals, relevant to their academic careers, and to improve research outcomes through a structured guidance for crafting scientific papers. Originality/value As main contribution and novelty, this paper intends to provide a canvas roadmap by identifying the main sections a scientific paper in the Business Management field must follow, and how to address specific features when writing these sections. This tool was conceived due the Business Management field needs a faster-to-address and easy-to-use tool and that summarizes main features of academic papers.

show abstract

Section: The Literature Review Sectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crafting scientific papers in business management: a canvas roadmap proposal

Ferasso

2021

MRJIAM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bibliometric analysis is a tool for tracing how scientific disciplines evolve (Ferasso & Cherobim, ; Koseoglu, Rahimi, Okumus, & Liu, ). This is accomplished by looking at data sources consisting of the bibliographic information of published studies, including articles, books, conference papers, and journals (Koseoglu, ; Koseoglu, Akdeve, & Craft, ; Ocak, Koseoglu, & Yildiz, ).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature

Köseoğlu

Yıldız

Cıftcı

2017

Business Ethics: A Eur Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary aim of this study is to clarify the authorship trends, collaboration patterns, and impact factors in business ethics literature by looking at articles published between 1960 and 2015 in four leading business ethics journals: Business and Society, Business Ethics: A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, and the Journal of Business Ethics. This study showed the growth type of business ethics literature, authorship trends, collaboration patterns, authors' productivity evolved by subperiods and journals, and authors' dominance factor by subperiods and journals. After providing an evaluation of the results of the study, the authors discuss the study's limitations and suggestions for future research.

show abstract

“…There is a growing interest in assessing the current state of academic studies. The bibliometric analysis method was used in many studies of service research, including ecosystem services evaluation (Chen et al, 2020), cloud manufacturing (Morelli and Ignacio, 2021), service innovation research (Sakata et al, 2013), smart cities research (Guo et al, 2019), research on goods and service tax (Dhar and Khandelwal, 2020), innovation metrics (Ferasso and Cherobim, 2017), service supply chain (Nagariya et al, 2019) and knowledge development in thoughtful tourism research (Johnson and Samakovlis, 2019). They all add essential pieces to service research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the barriers and motivators of value co-creation through a theoretical lens of service-dominant logic

Ajmal

Jan

Khan

et al. 2023

JBIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to identify and categorize the barriers and motivators to value co-creation and to establish its theoretical link with the five axioms of value co-creation. Design/methodology/approach The study used a qualitative approach based on a bibliographic literature review for identifying barriers and motivators of value co-creation. Subsequently, this study grouped those barriers and motivators into three categories. It further linked those barriers and motivators with five axioms of value co-creation using the grounded theory. Findings Results based on the categorization of barriers show that the first category “organization and system-related barriers” is associated with Axioms 1, 2 and 5 of the service-dominant logic. The second category “customer-oriented barriers” is associated with Axioms 2, 4 and 5. The third category of barriers “social environmental and economic barriers” is related to only Axiom 3. Results based on the motivators show that the first category “organization and system-related motivators” is associated with Axioms 2 and 4. The second category of “customer-oriented motivators” is associated with Axioms 1, 2, 3 and 5. The third category of motivators “social environmental and economic motivators” is related to Axioms 3 and 5. Practical implications These results provide insights to managers for eradicating barriers from the value co-creation process by emphasizing strategic intrusion into those axioms that contain a high percentage of barriers. Similarly, it also provides insights to managers for expediting motivators of value co-creation by strategic intrusion based on the axioms that contain a high percentage of motivators. Overall, this study will serve for greater value co-creation by eradicating barriers and promoting motivators. This study also provides a theoretical foundation for future studies intended to establish a theoretical connection between the barriers and motivators with value co-creation in other industries. Originality/value This study is novel in terms of identifying barriers and motivators of value creation by categorizing those identified barriers and motivators into three sub-categories. This study is the first one for linking barriers and motivators with five axioms of value creation for a micro-level policy formulation.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis of international researches on innovation metrics

Cited by 9 publications

References 50 publications

Crafting scientific papers in business management: a canvas roadmap proposal

Crafting scientific papers in business management: a canvas roadmap proposal

Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature

Exploring the barriers and motivators of value co-creation through a theoretical lens of service-dominant logic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About